Thanks for voting, everyone.
KIP-319 has passed with 3 binding (Guozhang, Matthias, Damian) and 3
non-binding votes (Ted, Bill, and me!).
If you wish to review the implementation, I plan to build on the draft PR:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5257
Thanks again,
-John
On Thu, Jun 28,
+1
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 17:22 Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:07 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 6/25/18 3:00 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Mon,
+1
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:07 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 6/25/18 3:00 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:56 PM, John Roesler
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>>
+1 (binding)
On 6/25/18 3:00 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:56 PM, John Roesler wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the discussion on KIP-319. I'd now like to start the voting.
>>>
>>> As a
+1
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:56 PM, John Roesler wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Thanks for the discussion on KIP-319. I'd now like to start the voting.
> >
> > As a reminder, KIP-319 proposes a fix to an issue I identified in
> >
+1
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:56 PM, John Roesler wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Thanks for the discussion on KIP-319. I'd now like to start the voting.
>
> As a reminder, KIP-319 proposes a fix to an issue I identified in
> KAFKA-7080. Specifically, the issue is that we're creating
>
Hello All,
Thanks for the discussion on KIP-319. I'd now like to start the voting.
As a reminder, KIP-319 proposes a fix to an issue I identified in
KAFKA-7080. Specifically, the issue is that we're creating
CachingWindowStore with the *number of segments* instead of the *segment
size*.
Here's
