I see!
Thanks for the explanation Matt.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 20:10 Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> People cannot pick if their vote is binding or not. If a committer
> (https://kafka.apache.org/committers) votes, it's binding; otherwise, not.
>
> Thus, there is no default -- it depends who votes.
>
People cannot pick if their vote is binding or not. If a committer
(https://kafka.apache.org/committers) votes, it's binding; otherwise, not.
Thus, there is no default -- it depends who votes.
-Matthias
On 9/13/18 2:41 PM, Joan Goyeau wrote:
> Ok so a +1 is non binding by default.
>
> On
Ok so a +1 is non binding by default.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 17:25 Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> I only count 3 binding votes (Guozhang, Matthias, Damian). Plus 4
> non-binding (John, Ted, Bill, Dongjin) -- or 5 if you vote your own KIP :)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 9/11/18 12:53 AM, Joan Goyeau wrote:
>
I only count 3 binding votes (Guozhang, Matthias, Damian). Plus 4
non-binding (John, Ted, Bill, Dongjin) -- or 5 if you vote your own KIP :)
-Matthias
On 9/11/18 12:53 AM, Joan Goyeau wrote:
> Ok, so this is now accepted.
>
> Binding votes: +5
> Non-binding votes: +2
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, 5
Ok, so this is now accepted.
Binding votes: +5
Non-binding votes: +2
Thanks
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 21:38 John Roesler wrote:
> Hi Joan,
>
> Damian makes 3 binding votes, and the vote has been open longer than 72
> hours, so your KIP vote has passed!
>
> It's customary for you to send a final
Hi Joan,
Damian makes 3 binding votes, and the vote has been open longer than 72
hours, so your KIP vote has passed!
It's customary for you to send a final reply to this thread stating that
the vote has passed, and stating the number of binding and non-binding +1s.
Also please update the
+1
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 15:20 Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 9/1/18 2:40 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:53 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
>
+1 (binding)
On 9/1/18 2:40 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:53 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:24 PM Ted Yu wrote:
>>>
+1 (binding).
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:53 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:24 PM Ted Yu wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:18 PM John Roesler
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:53 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> -Bill
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:24 PM Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:18 PM John Roesler wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:16 PM Joan Goyeau wrote:
+1
-Bill
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:24 PM Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:18 PM John Roesler wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:16 PM Joan Goyeau wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We want to make sure that we always have a serde for all
+1
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:18 PM John Roesler wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:16 PM Joan Goyeau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We want to make sure that we always have a serde for all Materialized,
> > Serialized, Joined, Consumed and Produced.
> > For that we can make use
+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 1:16 PM Joan Goyeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to make sure that we always have a serde for all Materialized,
> Serialized, Joined, Consumed and Produced.
> For that we can make use of the implicit parameters in Scala.
>
> KIP:
>
>
Hi,
We want to make sure that we always have a serde for all Materialized,
Serialized, Joined, Consumed and Produced.
For that we can make use of the implicit parameters in Scala.
KIP:
14 matches
Mail list logo
