Thanks for all votes. KIP-367 has passed!!!
binding votes (3) :
Matthias J. Sax
Harsha
Jason Gustafson
non-binding votes (6):
Dongjin Lee
Manikumar
Mickael Maison
vito jeng
Colin McCabe
Bill Bejeck
Cheers,
Chia-Ping
On 2018/09/08 18:27:59, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to put
+1 Thanks for the KIP
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:24 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks, Chia-Ping.
>
> best,
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, at 21:01, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > hi Colin
> >
> > > I like the idea of having a close(Duration) call. I would rather keep
> the
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks, Chia-Ping.
best,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, at 21:01, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> hi Colin
>
> > I like the idea of having a close(Duration) call. I would rather keep the
> > existing close(long, TimeUnit) call to avoid breaking compatibility,
> > however. Does the KIP
hi Colin
> I like the idea of having a close(Duration) call. I would rather keep the
> existing close(long, TimeUnit) call to avoid breaking compatibility, however.
> Does the KIP specify keeping the old overload? I can't seem to access the
> wiki now.
As Ismael said. All existing
Yeah, but it suggests deprecating the old method.
Ismael
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:06 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Chia-Ping,
>
> I like the idea of having a close(Duration) call. I would rather keep the
> existing close(long, TimeUnit) call to avoid breaking compatibility,
> however. Does
Hi Chia-Ping,
I like the idea of having a close(Duration) call. I would rather keep the
existing close(long, TimeUnit) call to avoid breaking compatibility, however.
Does the KIP specify keeping the old overload? I can't seem to access the wiki
now.
best,
Colin
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018, at
+1
-Bill
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:44 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> Thanks!
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:05 AM Manikumar
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:38 AM Harsha wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (Binding).
> > > Thanks,
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:05 AM Manikumar wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:38 AM Harsha wrote:
>
> > +1 (Binding).
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 9:06 PM, vito jeng wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:38 AM Harsha wrote:
> +1 (Binding).
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 9:06 PM, vito jeng wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Vito
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> >
> > > +1.
+1 (Binding).
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 9:06 PM, vito jeng wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> ---
> Vito
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
>
> > +1. (Non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:13 AM Matthias J. Sax
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks a lot for the KIP.
> >
+1
---
Vito
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> +1. (Non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:13 AM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for the KIP.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> > On 9/8/18 11:27 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> >
+1. (Non-binding)
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:13 AM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the KIP.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On 9/8/18 11:27 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to put KIP-367 to the vote.
> >
> >
>
Thanks a lot for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On 9/8/18 11:27 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to put KIP-367 to the vote.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=89070496
>
> --
> Chia-Ping
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi All,
I'd like to put KIP-367 to the vote.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=89070496
--
Chia-Ping
14 matches
Mail list logo