Perfect, thank you very much!
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:00 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> The code is ready for review now:
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10738
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:58 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
The code is ready for review now: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10738
Thanks,
Viktor
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:58 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> I saw your email the other day. Unfortunately this has been deprioritized
> in our team back then but now I started to rebase
Hi Matthew,
I saw your email the other day. Unfortunately this has been deprioritized
in our team back then but now I started to rebase and finish the solution.
I'll create a PR (at least a draft) sometime later today and hopefully can
start reviewing it soon in a few days.
Viktor
On Tue, May
Forgot to mention the code that was never merged in the PR
https://github.com/omkreddy/kafka/commit/fc47aa8d06828ef1de1c12b6c33192e10e3afd0c
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:42 AM Matthew de Detrich <
matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io> wrote:
> Apologies for necro/bump on this topic, but I am currently
Apologies for necro/bump on this topic, but I am currently trying to work on
tihs topic and I noticed that the PR in question for KAFKA-6945 never up being
created/merged (I have checked through git logs plus manually looking at the
code).
Is there a reason why this PR was never created/merged
Hi All,
As a few days passed and we have the required number of binding votes, the
KIP has passed it.
Thank you all who have voted, I'll post the PR about this soon!
Binding votes: Manikumar, Harsha, Jun
Non-binding ones: Ryanne
Thanks,
Viktor
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:56 AM Viktor
Hi Rajini,
I rebased my older PR and double checked it. It'll work with a new resource
type without adding new fields the ACL admin client APIs. As I mentioned
though, it'll be good to increment their version though to allow more
graceful handling of the protocol compatibilities as an older
Hi Rajini,
1) I think we can to keep the conventions in the tool. As an addition we
wouldn't have to retain certain characters (for creating the list).
2) Yes, so based on 1) and this --users changes to --user-principal (and
accepts one single user principal).
3) Looking at it again probably
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for the KIP. A few questions:
1) kafka-acls.sh has options like* --topic* that specifies a single topic.
Is there a reason why we want to have *--users* instead of *--user *with a
single user?
2) We use user principal rather than just the name everywhere else. Can we
do the
Hi Jun & Richard,
Jun, thanks for your feedback and vote.
100. Thanks, I'll correct that.
101. (@Richard) in this case the principal names will be something like
"CN=writeuser,OU=Unknown,O=Unknown,L=Unknown,ST=Unknown,C=Unknown" unless
principal mapping or builder is defined (refer to [1]). I
Hi Jun,
Can the SSL username really include the comma?
>From what I could tell, when I searched it up, I couldn't find anything
that indicated comma can be a delimiter.
A related doc below:
https://knowledge.digicert.com/solution/SO12401.html
Cheers,
Richard
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:37 PM
Hi, Viktor,
Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me. Just a couple of minor comments below.
100. CreateDelegationTokenResponse/DescribeDelegationTokenResponse. It
seems that "validVersions" should be "0-2".
101. The option --users "owner1,owner2" in AclCommand. Since SSL user name
can include comma,
Hey folks, bumping this again as KIP freeze is nearing and I hope to get
this into the next release.
We need only one binding vote.
Thanks,
Viktor
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 1:56 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Bumping this in the hope of a vote or additional feedback.
>
> Viktor
>
> On Tue, Dec
Bumping this in the hope of a vote or additional feedback.
Viktor
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:07 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like to bump this once more in the hope of a binding vote or any
> additional feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:24 PM
Hi Folks,
I'd like to bump this once more in the hope of a binding vote or any
additional feedback.
Thanks,
Viktor
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:24 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Would like to bump this in the hope of one binding vote (or any additional
> feedback).
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi All,
Would like to bump this in the hope of one binding vote (or any additional
feedback).
Thanks,
Viktor
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:25 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Harsha, Ryanne: thanks for the vote!
>
> I'd like to bump this again as today is the KIP freeze date and there
Hi All,
Harsha, Ryanne: thanks for the vote!
I'd like to bump this again as today is the KIP freeze date and there is
still one binding vote needed which I'm hoping to get in order to have this
included in 2.4.
Thanks,
Viktor
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:18 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> +1
+1 non-binding
Ryanne
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, 5:11 PM Harsha Ch wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP Viktor
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harsha
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:02 AM, Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> viktorsomo...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > I'd like to bump this
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP Viktor
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 3:02 AM, Viktor Somogyi-Vass < viktorsomo...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I'd like to bump this again in order to get some more binding votes and/or
> feedback in the hope we can push this in
Hi All,
I'd like to bump this again in order to get some more binding votes and/or
feedback in the hope we can push this in for 2.4.
Thank you Manikumar, Gabor and Ryanne so far for the votes! (the last two
were on the discussion thread after starting the vote but I think it still
counts :) )
Hi,
+1 (binding).
Thanks for the updated KIP. LGTM.
Thanks,
Manikumar
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:14 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Bumping this, I'd be happy to get some additional feedback and/or votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:04 AM Viktor
Hi All,
Bumping this, I'd be happy to get some additional feedback and/or votes.
Thanks,
Viktor
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:04 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
viktorsomo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on this KIP.
>
>
Hi All,
I'd like to start a vote on this KIP.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-373%3A+Allow+users+to+create+delegation+tokens+for+other+users
To summarize it: the proposed feature would allow users (usually
superusers) to create delegation tokens for other users. This is
23 matches
Mail list logo
