Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-07-06 Thread Matthias J. Sax
I am late, but I am also +1 (binding). -Matthias On 7/6/20 2:16 AM, Ivan Ponomarev wrote: > Wow! > > So excited to hear that! > > Thanks for your collaboration, now it's my turn to write a PR. > > Regards, > > Ivan > > 04.07.2020 20:16, John Roesler пишет: >> Hi Ivan, >> >> Congratulations!

Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-07-06 Thread Ivan Ponomarev
Wow! So excited to hear that! Thanks for your collaboration, now it's my turn to write a PR. Regards, Ivan 04.07.2020 20:16, John Roesler пишет: Hi Ivan, Congratulations! It looks like you have 3 binding and 2 non-binding votes, so you can announce this KIP as accepted and follow up with

Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-07-04 Thread John Roesler
Hi Ivan, Congratulations! It looks like you have 3 binding and 2 non-binding votes, so you can announce this KIP as accepted and follow up with a PR. Thanks, John On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 20:46, Bill Bejeck wrote: > Thanks for the KIP Ivan, +1 (binding). > > -Bill > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020

Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-06-29 Thread Bill Bejeck
Thanks for the KIP Ivan, +1 (binding). -Bill On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:22 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > +1 (binding). Thanks Ivan! > > > Guozhang > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:55 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < > quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan!

Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-06-29 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1 (binding). Thanks Ivan! Guozhang On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:55 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan! > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:07 PM John Roesler wrote: > > > Thanks, Ivan! > > > > I’m +1

Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-06-29 Thread Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan! +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:07 PM John Roesler wrote: > Thanks, Ivan! > > I’m +1 (binding) > > -John > > On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 17:24, Ivan Ponomarev wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes

Re: [VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-06-26 Thread John Roesler
Thanks, Ivan! I’m +1 (binding) -John On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 17:24, Ivan Ponomarev wrote: > Hello all! > > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes deprecation of > current `branch` method and provides a method-chaining based API for > branching. > >

[VOTE] KIP-418: A method-chaining way to branch KStream

2020-05-28 Thread Ivan Ponomarev
Hello all! I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes deprecation of current `branch` method and provides a method-chaining based API for branching. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-418%3A+A+method-chaining+way+to+branch+KStream Regards, Ivan