Hello again. Quick update on KIP-516. After much discussion and thought,
I've updated the KIP to include new admin apis and new/updated classes to
support them. The new APIs are:
default DescribeTopicsResult describeTopics(TopicCollection topics);
DescribeTopicsResult describeTopics(TopicCollecti
Hi all,
Another quick update. After some offline discussion with KIP-500 folks, I'm
making a small tweak to one of the configs in KIP-516.
Instead of delete.stale.topics.ms, KIP-516 will introduce
delete.topic.delay.ms which is defined as *"**The minimum amount of time to
wait before removing a del
Hi all,
I realized that the DISCUSS thread got very long, so I'll be posting
updates to this thread from now on.
Just a quick update to the KIP. As a part of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12332 and
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10143, I'm proposing adding a new
error.
INCONSIST
Thanks everyone for the votes. KIP-516 has been accepted.
Binding: Jun, Rajini, David
Non-binding: Lucas, Satish, Tom
Justine
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:22 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Thanks!
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:55 AM David Jacot wrote:
>
> > Hi Justine,
> >
> > Thanks fo
+1 non-binding. Thanks!
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:55 AM David Jacot wrote:
> Hi Justine,
>
> Thanks for the KIP! This is a great and long awaited improvement.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> David
>
> Le ven. 16 oct. 2020 à 17:36, Rajini Sivaram a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi Justine,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
>
Hi Justine,
Thanks for the KIP! This is a great and long awaited improvement.
+1 (binding)
Best,
David
Le ven. 16 oct. 2020 à 17:36, Rajini Sivaram a
écrit :
> Hi Justine,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for all the work you put into this KIP!
>
> btw, there is a typo in the DeleteTopics Request/
Hi Justine,
+1 (binding)
Thanks for all the work you put into this KIP!
btw, there is a typo in the DeleteTopics Request/Response schema in the
KIP, it says Metadata request.
Regards,
Rajini
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:06 PM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Hi Justine,
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (non-
Hi Justine,
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:48 PM Lucas Bradstreet wrote:
>
> Hi Justine,
>
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for all your hard work on this KIP!
>
> Lucas
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:59 AM Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Justine,
> >
> > Thanks for the updat
Hi Justine,
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for all your hard work on this KIP!
Lucas
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:59 AM Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Justine,
>
> Thanks for the updated KIP. +1 from me.
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:38 PM Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Justine,
> >
> > Thanks for starting th
Hi, Justine,
Thanks for the updated KIP. +1 from me.
Jun
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 2:38 PM Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Justine,
>
> Thanks for starting the vote. Just a few minor comments.
>
> 1. It seems that we should remove the topic field from the
> StopReplicaResponse below?
> StopReplica Response
Hi, Justine,
Thanks for starting the vote. Just a few minor comments.
1. It seems that we should remove the topic field from the
StopReplicaResponse below?
StopReplica Response (Version: 4) => error_code [topics]
error_code => INT16
topics => topic topic_id* [partitions]
2. "After controll
Hi all,
After further discussion and changes to this KIP, I think we are ready to
restart this vote.
Again, here is the KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-516%3A+Topic+Identifiers
The discussion thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7efa8cd169cadc7dc9cf86a7
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote on KIP-516: Topic Identifiers. Here is the KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-516%3A+Topic+Identifiers
The discussion thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7efa8cd169cadc7dc9cf86a7c0dbbab1836ddb5024d310fcebacf80c@%3Cdev.kafka.
13 matches
Mail list logo