Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Excuse me, that should read "4 binding +1 votes". Brian On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:26 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > With 5 binding +1 votes from Colin McCabe, Gwen Shapira, Manikumar Reddy, > and Jason Gustafson, and 2 non-binding +1 votes from Viktor Somogyi-Vass > and Jose Armando Garcia Sancio, the vote passes. > > Thanks, > Brian > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:23 PM Brian Byrne wrote: > >> >> Thanks everyone. Unless there's any additional input or issues raised, >> I'll close the vote Monday morning approx 10 am PST. >> >> Brian >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM Jason Gustafson >> wrote: >> >>> +1 Looking forward to this. I love the quality-of-life changes. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:00 PM Manikumar >>> wrote: >>> >>> > +1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: >>> > >>> > > +1 (binding) >>> > > >>> > > Thank you. >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Hello all, >>> > > > >>> > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > Brian >>> > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne >>> > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > Hello all, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK >>> > > > > functionality, linked here: >>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks, >>> > > > > Brian >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hello all, With 5 binding +1 votes from Colin McCabe, Gwen Shapira, Manikumar Reddy, and Jason Gustafson, and 2 non-binding +1 votes from Viktor Somogyi-Vass and Jose Armando Garcia Sancio, the vote passes. Thanks, Brian On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:23 PM Brian Byrne wrote: > > Thanks everyone. Unless there's any additional input or issues raised, > I'll close the vote Monday morning approx 10 am PST. > > Brian > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM Jason Gustafson > wrote: > >> +1 Looking forward to this. I love the quality-of-life changes. >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:00 PM Manikumar >> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (binding) >> > > >> > > Thank you. >> > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hello all, >> > > > >> > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Brian >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hello all, >> > > > > >> > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK >> > > > > functionality, linked here: >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Brian >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Thanks everyone. Unless there's any additional input or issues raised, I'll close the vote Monday morning approx 10 am PST. Brian On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1 Looking forward to this. I love the quality-of-life changes. > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:00 PM Manikumar > wrote: > > > +1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > > > > > functionality, linked here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
+1 Looking forward to this. I love the quality-of-life changes. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:00 PM Manikumar wrote: > +1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you. > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brian > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > > > > functionality, linked here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
+1 (binding), Thanks for the KIP. On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you. > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > > > functionality, linked here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brian > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
+1 (binding) Thank you. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 8:41 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > Thanks, > Brian > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > > functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hi Brian, LGTM. +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:28 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding). > > best, > Colin > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 08:41, Brian Byrne wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > > > functionality, linked here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brian > > > > > > -- -Jose
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hi Brian, Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding). best, Colin On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, at 08:41, Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > Ping. Any further votes or opinions? > > Thanks, > Brian > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > > functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hello all, Ping. Any further votes or opinions? Thanks, Brian On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:39 AM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > Thanks, > Brian >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
No problem :)
I also agree that it should be out of scope right now.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:10 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> Sorry, that should read "Hi Viktor",-C.
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 14:08, Colin McCabe wrote:
> > Hi Vikto,
> >
> > That's an interesting idea. However, I think it's better to consider
> > it outside the context of this KIP. I think one-letter abbreviations
> > would be controversial, and aren't really related to fixing the ZK
> > dependency here.
> >
> > +1 (binding). Thanks, Brian.
> >
> > best,
> > Colin
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 07:20, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > I was just asking it because of curiosity although I do think it would
> be
> > > useful but it should be done on all tools to keep them consistent.
> > > Perhaps it could be a future consideration.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on the KIP (non-binding).
> > >
> > > Viktor
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brian Byrne
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Viktor,
> > > >
> > > > That's a possibility, however there doesn't appear to be precedent
> for
> > > > one-letter abbreviations with the Kafka commands, so going with the
> current
> > > > flags seemed less controversial. I'm not against it if there's a
> consensus
> > > > that adding {-b, -bl, -u, -c, -t} is better, but as of now, you're
> the
> > > > first to voice it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Brian
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:01 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> > > > viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Brian,
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b'
> for
> > > > > --brokers etc.?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Viktor
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK
> > > > > > functionality, linked here:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Brian
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Sorry, that should read "Hi Viktor",-C.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 14:08, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Vikto,
>
> That's an interesting idea. However, I think it's better to consider
> it outside the context of this KIP. I think one-letter abbreviations
> would be controversial, and aren't really related to fixing the ZK
> dependency here.
>
> +1 (binding). Thanks, Brian.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 07:20, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > I was just asking it because of curiosity although I do think it would be
> > useful but it should be done on all tools to keep them consistent.
> > Perhaps it could be a future consideration.
> >
> > I'm +1 on the KIP (non-binding).
> >
> > Viktor
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Viktor,
> > >
> > > That's a possibility, however there doesn't appear to be precedent for
> > > one-letter abbreviations with the Kafka commands, so going with the
> > > current
> > > flags seemed less controversial. I'm not against it if there's a consensus
> > > that adding {-b, -bl, -u, -c, -t} is better, but as of now, you're the
> > > first to voice it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Brian
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:01 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> > > viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Brian,
> > > >
> > > > Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b' for
> > > > --brokers etc.?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Viktor
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK
> > > > > functionality, linked here:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Brian
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hi Vikto,
That's an interesting idea. However, I think it's better to consider it
outside the context of this KIP. I think one-letter abbreviations would be
controversial, and aren't really related to fixing the ZK dependency here.
+1 (binding). Thanks, Brian.
best,
Colin
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 07:20, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I was just asking it because of curiosity although I do think it would be
> useful but it should be done on all tools to keep them consistent.
> Perhaps it could be a future consideration.
>
> I'm +1 on the KIP (non-binding).
>
> Viktor
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
>
> > Hi Viktor,
> >
> > That's a possibility, however there doesn't appear to be precedent for
> > one-letter abbreviations with the Kafka commands, so going with the current
> > flags seemed less controversial. I'm not against it if there's a consensus
> > that adding {-b, -bl, -u, -c, -t} is better, but as of now, you're the
> > first to voice it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:01 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> > viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b' for
> > > --brokers etc.?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Viktor
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK
> > > > functionality, linked here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Brian
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hi Brian,
I was just asking it because of curiosity although I do think it would be
useful but it should be done on all tools to keep them consistent.
Perhaps it could be a future consideration.
I'm +1 on the KIP (non-binding).
Viktor
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:50 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> That's a possibility, however there doesn't appear to be precedent for
> one-letter abbreviations with the Kafka commands, so going with the current
> flags seemed less controversial. I'm not against it if there's a consensus
> that adding {-b, -bl, -u, -c, -t} is better, but as of now, you're the
> first to voice it.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:01 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass <
> viktorsomo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b' for
> > --brokers etc.?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Viktor
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK
> > > functionality, linked here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Brian
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hi Viktor,
That's a possibility, however there doesn't appear to be precedent for
one-letter abbreviations with the Kafka commands, so going with the current
flags seemed less controversial. I'm not against it if there's a consensus
that adding {-b, -bl, -u, -c, -t} is better, but as of now, you're the
first to voice it.
Thanks,
Brian
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:01 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b' for
> --brokers etc.?
>
> Thanks,
> Viktor
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK
> > functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brian
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hi Brian, Have you thought about having one letter abbreviations like '-b' for --brokers etc.? Thanks, Viktor On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:39 PM Brian Byrne wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK > functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw > > Thanks, > Brian >
[VOTE] KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality
Hello all, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-543: Expand ConfigCommand's non-ZK functionality, linked here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ww-3Bw Thanks, Brian
