Thanks for all the very helpful discussions, I'm closing the vote with
a tally here:
+1: 7 (Nick, John, Walker, Bruno, Lucas, Matthias, Guozhang), with 5
binding votes and 2 non-binding votes.
-1: 0
Guozhang
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:48 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
Thanks!
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On 1/24/23 1:17 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
Hi Matthias:
re "paused" -> "suspended": I got your point now, thanks. Just to
clarify the two functions are a bit different: "paused" tasks are
because of the topology being paused, i.e. from KIP-834; whereas
Hi Matthias:
re "paused" -> "suspended": I got your point now, thanks. Just to
clarify the two functions are a bit different: "paused" tasks are
because of the topology being paused, i.e. from KIP-834; whereas
"suspended" tasks are when a restoring tasks are being removed before
it completes due
Hey, I'm changing my vote to binding now :)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:38 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> Thanks Guozhang. Couple of clarifications and follow up questions.
>
>
> >> I'm not aware of a discussion to rename the call name to "suspend" for
> >> KIP-834. Could you point me to the
Thanks Guozhang. Couple of clarifications and follow up questions.
I'm not aware of a discussion to rename the call name to "suspend" for
KIP-834. Could you point me to the reference?
My commend was not about KIP-834, but about this KIP. You originally
proposed to call the new call-back
Hello Matthias,
Thanks for the feedback. I was on vacation for a while. Pardon for the
late replies. Please see them inline below
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 11:23 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> Seems I am late to the party... Great KIP. Couple of questions from my side:
>
> (1) What is the purpose
Seems I am late to the party... Great KIP. Couple of questions from my side:
(1) What is the purpose of `standby-updating-tasks`? It seems to be the
same as the number of assigned standby task? Not sure how useful it
would be?
(2) `active-paused-tasks` / `standby-paused-tasks` -- what does
We need this!
+ 1 non binding
Cheers,
Lucas
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 10:01 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
>
> Guozhang,
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On 25.10.22 22:07, Walker Carlson wrote:
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > Thanks for the kip!
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at
Guozhang,
Thanks for the KIP!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Bruno
On 25.10.22 22:07, Walker Carlson wrote:
+1 non binding
Thanks for the kip!
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:25 PM John Roesler wrote:
Thanks for the KIP, Guozhang!
I'm +1 (binding)
-John
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 16:36, Nick Telford
+1 non binding
Thanks for the kip!
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:25 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, Guozhang!
>
> I'm +1 (binding)
>
> -John
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 16:36, Nick Telford wrote:
> > Can't wait!
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2022, 18:02 Guozhang Wang,
Thanks for the KIP, Guozhang!
I'm +1 (binding)
-John
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 16:36, Nick Telford wrote:
> Can't wait!
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2022, 18:02 Guozhang Wang,
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'd like to start a vote for the following KIP, aiming to improve Kafka
>>
Can't wait!
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022, 18:02 Guozhang Wang,
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote for the following KIP, aiming to improve Kafka
> Stream's restoration visibility via new metrics and callback methods:
>
>
>
Hello all,
I'd like to start a vote for the following KIP, aiming to improve Kafka
Stream's restoration visibility via new metrics and callback methods:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-869%3A+Improve+Streams+State+Restoration+Visibility
Thanks!
-- Guozhang
13 matches
Mail list logo
