> > >>> - In order to implement this change, table aggregate
>> processors need
>> > >>> a way to determine whether a record is out-of-order or not.
>> This
>> > >>> cannot be
>> > >>> done by que
ade implications properly handled) via KIP-904
> > >>> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-904%3A+Kafka+Streams+-+Guarantee+subtractor+is+called+before+adder+if+key+has+not+changed
> >,
> > >>> so making an additional
tition topic format to
> >>> add a
> >>> timestamp comes at no additional cost to users.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have updated the KIP
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-914%3A+DSL+Processor+Sema
Mar 22, 2023 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-914 Join Processor Semantics for Versioned Stores
To:
Thanks for voting, everyone! We have three binding yes votes with no
objections during four full days of voting. I will close the vote and mark
the KIP as accepted, right in time for th
IP
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-914%3A+DSL+Processor+Semantics+for+Versioned+Stores>
> > itself with more detail about each of these changes. Please let me know if
> > there are any concerns. In the absence of dissent, I'd like to include
>
ct: Re: [VOTE] KIP-914 Join Processor Semantics for Versioned Stores
To:
Thanks for voting, everyone! We have three binding yes votes with no
objections during four full days of voting. I will close the vote and mark
the KIP as accepted, right in time for the 3.5 release.
Thanks,
Victoria
On Wed, M
g with the rest of KIP-914 in the 3.5 release.
Apologies for not noticing these additional semantics implications earlier,
Victoria
-- Forwarded message -
From: Victoria Xia
Date: Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-914 Join Processor Semantics for Versione
Thanks for voting, everyone! We have three binding yes votes with no
objections during four full days of voting. I will close the vote and mark
the KIP as accepted, right in time for the 3.5 release.
Thanks,
Victoria
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 7:11 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
+1 (binding)
Thanks Victoria!
Best,
Bruno
On 20.03.23 17:13, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/23 9:05 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
+1, thank you Victoria!
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 8:27 AM Victoria Xia
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka
+1 (binding)
On 3/20/23 9:05 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
+1, thank you Victoria!
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 8:27 AM Victoria Xia
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Streams join
processors to use proper timestamp-based semantics in applications with
+1, thank you Victoria!
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 8:27 AM Victoria Xia
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Streams join
> processors to use proper timestamp-based semantics in applications with
> versioned stores:
>
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-914 for updating the Kafka Streams join
processors to use proper timestamp-based semantics in applications with
versioned stores:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-914%3A+Join+Processor+Semantics+for+Versioned+Stores
To avoid
12 matches
Mail list logo
