[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
John Roesler resolved KAFKA-7393. --------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix We realized that Suppressed needs to support a name parameter in keeping with KIP-372, which provides a way to solve this problem. If you supply `withName` to Suppressed, it will be independent of topologically numbered names, as desired. > Consider making suppression node names independent of topologically numbered > names. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-7393 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7393 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: streams > Reporter: John Roesler > Priority: Major > > See [https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5567#discussion_r214188984] (please > keep the discussion on this Jira ticket). > There is an opportunity to use a slightly different naming strategy for > suppression nodes so that they can be moved around the topology without > upsetting other nodes' names. > The main downside is that it might be confusing to have a separate naming > strategy for just this one kind of node. > Then again, this could create important opportunities for topology-compatible > optimizations. > > At a higher design/implementation cost, but a lower ongoing complexity, we > could consider this naming approach for all node types. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)