but they can drag on sometimes.
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:31:37 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API
> > From: wangg...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> >
> > +1.
> >
>
+1 (non-binding)
+1 for re-evaluating the KIP process. This one went through very quickly, but
they can drag on sometimes.
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:31:37 -0700
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-51 - List Connectors REST API
> From: wangg...@
+1.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Ashish Singh wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process.
> >
> > I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process.
>
> I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the release (Maybe even
> in-person at Kafka Summit?) to discuss.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:59 PM,
Very large +1 on re-evaluating the KIP process.
I was hoping we can do a meta-kip meeting after the release (Maybe even
in-person at Kafka Summit?) to discuss.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Grant Henke wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I am also a +1 to evaluating the KIP
+1 (non-binding)
Ismael
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible,
> and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to just
> kick off voting on this KIP
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Liquan Pei wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen
+1
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1
>
> Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> wrote:
>
> > Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into
+1
Straight forward enough and can't possibly break anything.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible,
> and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> Since it's pretty minimal, we'd like to squeeze it into 0.10 if possible,
> and VOTE threads take 3 days, it was suggested it might make sense to just
> kick off voting on this KIP immediately
10 matches
Mail list logo