+1 for 3.0.0. For a start I like it as it is right now :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com wrote:
+1, since we already had and still have so much un-discussed changes
in the past
2012/8/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1, we should be able to make that for 3.0.0
Regards
JB
On 08/17/2012 07:34 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
Hi,
I have created and attached a patch for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
3.0.0.
It pretty much
Hi,
I have created and attached a patch for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1718
I have it scheduled for 3.1.0, but if you agree we could also have it in
3.0.0.
It pretty much works as is, but if we agree to have it in 3.0.0 I could
work on a couple more improvements that I have in
+1 if can make it to catch 3.0.0 release train.
Freeman
－
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
On 2012-8-17, at
