By the way, you can take a look on Release Notes where you have the
dependency updates.
Regards
JB
On 14/01/2020 21:51, Eric Lilja wrote:
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test it on Windows, so cannot vote. I
> like to a do a manual test and also run some automated pax exam tests, but
>
Hi,
I'm facing a issue while starting under Windows 10 and JDK 11:
It seems there is a strange issue added in karaf.bat between 4.2.7 and
4.2.8. Some error also on actual 4.3 SNAPSHOTS.
Regards,
Benjamin
On 12.01.2020 12:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Karaf
IMHO, it's not 4.2.8 blocker. I can always do 4.2.9 very fast if needed.
Regards
JB
On 14/01/2020 21:27, Markus Rathgeb wrote:
> Hm, for me it depends if the multi part stuff that has been broken on
> 4.2.7 is working again (so depends on the findings of the respective
> thread on the user
Hi JB,
changing line ending from unix to windows seems to solve the issue.
Maybe some strange interpreter problem of the windows shell itself. I
would suggest to change line ending for all bat-files in the karaf
distribution.
What do you think?
Regards
Benjamin
On 15.01.2020 08:47, Benjamin
Hi Benjamin,
does it happen with JDK8 ?
I will fix for Karaf 4.2.9 and provide a workaround in the mean time.
Regards
JB
On 15/01/2020 08:26, Benjamin Graf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing a issue while starting under Windows 10 and JDK 11:
>
> It seems there is a strange issue added in karaf.bat
It will be part of the announcement PR:
https://github.com/apache/karaf-site/pull/51
I will generate one soon.
Regards
JB
On 14/01/2020 21:51, Eric Lilja wrote:
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test it on Windows, so cannot vote. I
> like to a do a manual test and also run some automated
Hi JB,
it's fine with JDK8. That's why I found the issue quite late.
Regards
Benjamin
On 15.01.2020 08:42, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> does it happen with JDK8 ?
>
> I will fix for Karaf 4.2.9 and provide a workaround in the mean time.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 15/01/2020
Hm, for me it depends if the multi part stuff that has been broken on
4.2.7 is working again (so depends on the findings of the respective
thread on the user mailing list).
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to test it on Windows, so cannot vote. I
like to a do a manual test and also run some automated pax exam tests, but
don't have time right now. I was also curious if there's an updated
dependency convergence report, and a comparison with the equivalent report
for
