Hi Ben,
Are you using JDK 11 (for both compile and runtime) ?
Regards
JB
> Le 20 mai 2021 à 08:17, Benjamin Graf a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems there is a bug with embedded resources. I think it is caused by
> Felix and not Karaf itself.
>
> How to reproduce:
>
> - Clean start of plain
isnt it a java 11 change (for mjar useless feature)?
->
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u/blob/master/src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/jar/JarFileFactory.java#L154
Last time i checked OSGi ecosystem (some libs are) was not ready for this
change leading to some issues like that.
Hello
Mind that https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues/50 was fixed
recently, but it was about missing import package.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 20 maj 2021 o 10:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofre napisał(a):
> Hi Ben,
>
> Are you using JDK 11 (for both compile and runtime) ?
>
>
+1
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 20/05/2021 à 13:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> In order to prepare R8 support, I would like to create karaf-4.3.x branch and
> update main to version 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT, and update to R8 and corresponding
> frameworks version (Felix and equinox).
Hi
Just a side note: I know almost nothing about R8 (core+cmpn), still trying
to have full R6 (cmpn) Whiteboard implementation in Pax Web ;) Fortunately
I see no changes in chapters 102 (HttpService), 128 (Web Applications) and
140 (Whiteboard).
However I see that chapter 101 (Log Service) is
Hi guys,
In order to prepare R8 support, I would like to create karaf-4.3.x branch and
update main to version 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT, and update to R8 and corresponding
frameworks version (Felix and equinox).
No objection ?
Regards
JB
Hi,
I think the work you are doing on Pax Web already cover R8 (no big change
there).
Pax Logging 2.1.x would be required for the new log version service, but it’s
minor change (not big effort).
The purpose is to prepare the update step by step, it’s normal that we don’t
have all ready yet
Hi,
just tried to run pax-transx-tm-narayana in plain Felix 7 on JDK11 and
still the same Exception trace.
Regards
Benjamin
On 20.05.2021 18:16, Benjamin Graf wrote:
Hi Grzegorz,
Of course do I remember issue #50. And I think it's not a bug in
pax-transx because everything is fine with
Hi Grzegorz,
Of course do I remember issue #50. And I think it's not a bug in
pax-transx because everything is fine with Karaf 4.2.11 on JDK11. The
error occurs on Karaf 4.3.2 maybe 4.3.x at all. So it might be a bug in
either newer Karaf or newer Felix?!
Regards
Benjamin
On 20.05.2021
Hi JB,
I use JDK 11 as runtime environment. There is no code to compile to
reproduce this bug just plain Karaf and pax-trans-tm-narayana from Maven
central.
Regards
Benjamin
On 20.05.2021 10:32, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
Hi Ben,
Are you using JDK 11 (for both compile and runtime) ?
Hi
Did you try `mvn clean install` latest pax-transx release?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 20 maj 2021 o 17:40 Benjamin Graf napisał(a):
> Hi JB,
>
> I use JDK 11 as runtime environment. There is no code to compile to
> reproduce this bug just plain Karaf and pax-trans-tm-narayana from
Hi Grzegorz,
the same error with pax-transx 0.5.1
* feature:repo-add pax-transx 0.5.1
* feature:repo-add pax-transx 0.5.1
Regards
Benjamin
On 20.05.2021 17:43, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
Hi
Did you try `mvn clean install` latest pax-transx release?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 20 maj
Hmm, but your remember this
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues/50 issue? I ensured
that pax-transx can run, build and test using JDK11... I'll check it again.
Could you file a bug to https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.transx/issues
?
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
czw., 20 maj
13 matches
Mail list logo
