+1
On 2024/04/09 11:18:41 Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> to make sure we release our 10 release with the supported versions of
> frameworks we use, I investigated the update of our codebase to Spring Boot
> 3.2.4. Based on (1), the current version we use, 3.0.x, is not supported
>
+1 for this idea. Future proofing our tech is certainly a good idea! I think
this could also lead to some consolidation of code in the future, if I
understand correctly.
On 2024/04/09 07:21:30 Enrique Gonzalez Martinez wrote:
> At present, it is very difficult adding new nodes and new states to
Yeah, that's totally fine.
On 2024/04/09 12:20:53 ricardo zanini fernandes wrote:
> Friends, since I sent the email on Friday afternoon, I think it's safer to
> wait one more day?
>
> I can close the pool today, by the end of my working hours.
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:17 PM
+1
On 2024/04/08 14:32:34 Paulo Martins wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am starting this official vote to accept the Sonataflow management
> console proposal discussed on this list [1], highlighting that it only
> considers changes in the tooling, and if any unplanned changes are needed
> in the
+1
El mar, 9 abr 2024, 17:45, Gabriele Cardosi
escribió:
> +1
>
> Il giorno mar 9 apr 2024 alle ore 17:22 Jan Šťastný >
> ha scritto:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Dne út 9. 4. 2024 14:23 uživatel ricardo zanini fernandes <
> > ricardozan...@gmail.com> napsal:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024
+1
Il giorno mar 9 apr 2024 alle ore 17:22 Jan Šťastný
ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Dne út 9. 4. 2024 14:23 uživatel ricardo zanini fernandes <
> ricardozan...@gmail.com> napsal:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:14 AM Yeser Amer wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 2024/04/09 11:18:41 Tibor
+1
Dne út 9. 4. 2024 14:23 uživatel ricardo zanini fernandes <
ricardozan...@gmail.com> napsal:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:14 AM Yeser Amer wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2024/04/09 11:18:41 Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > to make sure we release our 10 release with the
+1
From: ricardo zanini fernandes
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 6:23 AM
To: dev@kie.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extension mechanism for additional workflow
process definitions elements
+1000
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:20 AM Pere
+1000
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:20 AM Pere Fernandez (apache)
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 12:54, Alex Porcelli wrote:
>
> > Glad to hear that!
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
> > egonza...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > It will land after
+1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:14 AM Yeser Amer wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2024/04/09 11:18:41 Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > to make sure we release our 10 release with the supported versions of
> > frameworks we use, I investigated the update of our codebase to Spring
> Boot
> > 3.2.4.
Friends, since I sent the email on Friday afternoon, I think it's safer to
wait one more day?
I can close the pool today, by the end of my working hours.
Cheers!
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 12:17 PM ricardo zanini fernandes <
ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Jason!
>
> I'll send the final
+1
On 2024/04/09 11:18:41 Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> to make sure we release our 10 release with the supported versions of
> frameworks we use, I investigated the update of our codebase to Spring Boot
> 3.2.4. Based on (1), the current version we use, 3.0.x, is not supported
>
Hi Pere,
yes, there are, however kogito-apps take everything about specifying
versions from kogito-runtimes as far as I know (at least for Spring Boot).
I ran -apps locally, and it worked. If you can, please test it too. Better
to check on "multiple nodes" :)
Best regards,
Tibor
On Tue, Apr 9,
+1
@Tibor, `kogito-apps` also has some Spring Boot dependencies in the
`data-audit` module, I don't think this could break them but maybe worth
looking into. I'll try to give it a test as soon as I can.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 13:19, Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> to make sure we
+1
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 12:54, Alex Porcelli wrote:
> Glad to hear that!
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
> egonza...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > It will land after for sure.
> >
> > El mar, 9 abr 2024, 12:41, Alex Porcelli escribió:
> >
> > > What about any
Hi everyone,
to make sure we release our 10 release with the supported versions of
frameworks we use, I investigated the update of our codebase to Spring Boot
3.2.4. Based on (1), the current version we use, 3.0.x, is not supported
anymore, and the support ended in November last year. I didn't
Glad to hear that!
+1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
egonza...@apache.org> wrote:
> It will land after for sure.
>
> El mar, 9 abr 2024, 12:41, Alex Porcelli escribió:
>
> > What about any risk of instability?
> >
> > Looks like we are about 2-3 weeks from be ready
It will land after for sure.
El mar, 9 abr 2024, 12:41, Alex Porcelli escribió:
> What about any risk of instability?
>
> Looks like we are about 2-3 weeks from be ready to release, is this
> something that could land just after?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:33 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
What about any risk of instability?
Looks like we are about 2-3 weeks from be ready to release, is this
something that could land just after?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:33 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez <
egonza...@apache.org> wrote:
> I dont see any impact as functionality won't change
>
> El
I dont see any impact as functionality won't change
El mar, 9 abr 2024, 12:18, Alex Porcelli escribió:
> Enrique,
>
> How you see this proposal affecting the 10.0.0 release?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 5:35 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
> ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Enrique,
> >
Enrique,
How you see this proposal affecting the 10.0.0 release?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 5:35 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
ftira...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Enrique,
> Thanks for writing down the proposal
> +10 ;)
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:50 AM Tibor Zimányi wrote:
>
> > Hi Enrique,
>
+1
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 11:51 +0300, Toni Rikkola wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 9:28 PM Jan Šťastný
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Dne po 8. 4. 2024 18:05 uživatel Pere Fernandez (apache) <
> > pefer...@apache.org> napsal:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 17:19, ricardo
Hi Enrique,
Thanks for writing down the proposal
+10 ;)
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:50 AM Tibor Zimányi wrote:
> Hi Enrique,
>
> thank you, sounds good, +1.
>
> Best regards,
> Tibor
>
> Dňa ut 9. 4. 2024, 9:21 Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
> napísal(a):
>
> > At present, it is very difficult adding
+1
On 2024/04/08 14:32:34 Paulo Martins wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am starting this official vote to accept the Sonataflow management
> console proposal discussed on this list [1], highlighting that it only
> considers changes in the tooling, and if any unplanned changes are needed
> in the
+1
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 9:28 PM Jan Šťastný wrote:
> +1
>
> Dne po 8. 4. 2024 18:05 uživatel Pere Fernandez (apache) <
> pefer...@apache.org> napsal:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 17:19, ricardo zanini fernandes <
> > ricardozan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon,
Hi Enrique,
thank you, sounds good, +1.
Best regards,
Tibor
Dňa ut 9. 4. 2024, 9:21 Enrique Gonzalez Martinez
napísal(a):
> At present, it is very difficult adding new nodes and new states to
> the workflow engine.
>
> In the medium/long term, additional node types that only serve certain
>
At present, it is very difficult adding new nodes and new states to
the workflow engine.
In the medium/long term, additional node types that only serve certain
requirements will be needed. The reasons for adding them can be really
different and they might only be useful in certain situations or
27 matches
Mail list logo
