Hi Enrique,
As you know, the compact architecture, is only one of the architectures
supported by the project, but no the only one. I fact, we have many user
installations on top of the "non compact architecture". So, any potential
refactoring, etc., must keep that in mind.
In step 4), when you
You could also leave the vote open for a longer time. 72 hours is a minimum. We
could use this as a reminder for people to vote (including myself).
--
Jason Porter
Software Engineer
He/Him/His
IBM
From: Toni Rikkola
Date: Friday, April 25, 2025 at 09:24
To: dev@kie.apache.org
Subject: [EXTER
Ok time is up, closing the vote.
Since we only got 2 votes I would not count this as a pass.
I suspect the timing is bad. I will bring this up again later this year.
Thank you
Toni
On 2025/04/22 07:38:38 Toni Rikkola wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the late follow up on this, but here goes.
>
>
There really is nothing that we can decide on that meeting. I believe it was
useful in the beginning, but no longer needed.
+1 to suggestion.
Toni
On 2025/04/25 13:15:14 Tiago Bento wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> For a certain period of time we hosted sync meetings on Friday
> mornings (on EST time
+1
I think the meetings served a good purpose by helping us adjust to the
Apache way. I'd argue that today we are already fully adapted to it.
Thanks for taking the initiative to properly close this out, Tiago.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 9:15 AM Tiago Bento wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> For a certa
Hi everyone,
For a certain period of time we hosted sync meetings on Friday
mornings (on EST time-zone), but it's been a while since people
started not showing up and I think at this point this initiative is
abandoned.
I personally think this is encouragement for us to be more active here
in the
Paolo,
I think you most certainly *can* step up and start clicking buttons.
That’s what Alex and I did for 10.0.0, and that’s what we’re doing
now.
This document is the manifestation of what we learned during the
process, plus what we want to do for 10.1.0. There’s a similar
document (now frozen)
Hi Alex,
as I said, I don't think this approach is working well.
Please, let's try to share information about blockers and requests for
support either here or on the zulip chat, so taht others can provide
support.
The release document does not seem appropriate - for example, who is
doing/taking
Thank you for your interest, I’ve reported a few times in original thread
issues being faced.
Right now I’ve been stuck with Kogito branch pipeline that failed, and it’s
necessary recovery all. Because of misalignment of the main branches, it’s
also necessary to align with a weekly, so you first a
Paolo,
These two threads might be relevant to you:
- [PROPOSAL] 10.1.0 Release -
https://lists.apache.org/thread/zl3csqsvgk1y5ldvhhqw3notpd89kch9
- [PROPOSAL] Immediate 10.1.0 Release from main -
https://lists.apache.org/thread/6pcdzhbt111y7flycxck2c83jvc36mbo
We also have a dedicated thread on Z
10 matches
Mail list logo
