Re: Plans for the Next Apache Knox Release

Should we consider the maven groupId change separately from the package name change? On 8/5/14 1:58 PM, larry mccay wrote: Yes - that is a good point and should be done regardless of version designation but certainly if we are to go with a 1.0. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Kevin Minder

Commits should include CHANGES.txt update

Folks - I feel as though we should uptake the policy that is used for Hadoop common commits where every commit includes a record of the change in CHANGES.txt. This will make the release process easier since we won't have to backfill all of the changes at release candidate creation time. Also,

Re: Commits should include CHANGES.txt update

This makes sense to me and isn't too much overhead. On 8/5/14 4:30 PM, larry mccay wrote: Folks - I feel as though we should uptake the policy that is used for Hadoop common commits where every commit includes a record of the change in CHANGES.txt. This will make the release process easier