+1 (binding)
Downloaded knox-0.5.0, built from source and unit tests passed.
I verified the signatures and ran through many of the samples including:
webhdfs, webhcat, knox admin api, yarn rm, LDAP configuration with group
lookup and dynamic group lookup.
Tested against a sandbox HDP 2.2 preview
+1 (binding)
Downloaded Knox files
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.5.0/ (excluding HSSO)
Verified MDF, SHA and ASC for all files
Built source extracted from zip and ran unit tests which passed
Verified most of the samples from the 0.5.0 User's Guide (excluding Hive).
On
+1 (non-binding).
I built the branch successfully as well as downloaded the RC, verified
signatures and installed it. After install I went through testing against
various services like HDFS, HBase and Hive. I also went through various
sections of the 0.5.0 user guide successfully. Some of the
All -
A new candidate for the Apache Knox 0.5.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.5.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
Branch v0.5.0 (git checkout -b v0.5.0)
The SHA1 checksum of
All -
A candidate for the Apache Knox 0.5.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.5.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/knox.git
Branch v0.5.0 (git checkout -b v0.5.0)
The SHA1 checksum of
+1
On Sep 23, 2014, at 2:00 PM, larry mccay lmc...@apache.org wrote:
All -
A candidate for the Apache Knox 0.5.0 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/knox/knox-0.5.0/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
Sorry about the premature +1, I had manually verified some earlier bits and not
these. I’ll do some verification and recast my vote.
Sumit.
On Sep 23, 2014, at 2:52 PM, Sumit Gupta sumit.gu...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1
On Sep 23, 2014, at 2:00 PM, larry mccay lmc...@apache.org wrote:
I verified the signatures and the hashes but I'm not ready to vote as I
haven't done any functional validation yet.
On 9/23/14 2:58 PM, Sumit Gupta wrote:
Sorry about the premature +1, I had manually verified some earlier bits and not
these. I’ll do some verification and recast my vote.