Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-17 Thread Dan Burkert
+1 - Dan On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > OK, given it's not a regression does anyone strongly oppose moving forward > with 1.1.0 and try to squeeze 1.1.1 in in a couple weeks? In general my > philosophy is that each release should be at least as stable

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-17 Thread Jordan Birdsell
Agreed with proceeding and doing a 1.1.1 release. On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, 5:11 PM Dan Burkert wrote: > Not a regression, it's been there since the add/drop range partitions > feature landed. > > - Dan > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Todd Lipcon

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-17 Thread Dan Burkert
Not a regression, it's been there since the add/drop range partitions feature landed. - Dan On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Sorry for radio silence on the vote thread so far -- been traveling this > week. > > Is the range partition bug a regression or

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-17 Thread Dan Burkert
Dimitris Tsirogiannis just uncovered a bug that allows unintended range partitions to be dropped: KUDU-1750 . The bug allows a range partition to be dropped if either the lower or upper bound range partition key matches, instead of requiring both

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-17 Thread Brock Noland
+1 (non-binding) Built on 7.2 and ran tests On Monday, November 14, 2016, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Kudu team is happy to announce the first release candidate for > Apache Kudu 1.1.0. > > Apache Kudu 1.1 is a minor release which adds various new features, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-17 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
+1 I built Kudu on RHEL7.2 and SLES12 SP1, the latter needed the following change to build but no biggie: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/5130/ I've also been running non-stop YCSB (compiled with the new client) against a small 1.1.0 cluster, looks good. I tried an Impala snapshot and saw that

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-15 Thread Dinesh Bhat
+1 Built release bits on Centos6.6 - Ran ctest, all pass - Ran dist_test --run-all, all pass PS: Fresh build is generating good number of [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] warnings, we can fix them post 1.1. https://gist.github.com/dineshabbi/ba77063fdd3a97439adbe4242f17cae1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-15 Thread Jordan Birdsell
+1 Tested on RHEL 7.2, all tests passed except what is noted below for Python 3 . 2 known issues were presented with Python 3, neither of these are blockers: - setup.py contained multiprocessing as a test dependency, however this is included as a standard library in all version of python

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-14 Thread Dan Burkert
+1 Built and tested on OS X 10.10 in debug mode, and checked hashes and signature. A few of the tests failed, but these are expected for this release (and have already been fixed on master): * client_samples-test * external_mini_cluster-test * sasl_rpc-test * pstack_watcher-test sasl_rpc-test

[VOTE] Apache Kudu 1.1.0 RC1

2016-11-14 Thread Todd Lipcon
Hi, The Apache Kudu team is happy to announce the first release candidate for Apache Kudu 1.1.0. Apache Kudu 1.1 is a minor release which adds various new features, improvements, bug fixes, and optimizations on top of Kudu 1.0. Please see the release notes for details. The is a source-only