Hi dan
We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them -
this is the biggest issue we have now.
this was my only remark when Robert presented its interresting project
Yes, we need the validators and the programers to implement backend and
improve the macro.
Robert Ludvik a écrit :
Hi Robert,
From my point of view it is terrific idea. I know doctors and lawyers
who are creating their own small dictionaries and would really like to
contribute words into the official spellcheck dictionary. Many small
dictionaries means one big dictionary ;-)
Alex Thurgood pravi:
We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them
- this is the biggest issue we have now.
Well, you can count me in.
Alex
If you speak Slovenian, I'd be honoured ;-)
Robert Ludvik
Robert Ludvik a écrit :
If you speak Slovenian, I'd be honoured ;-)
Haven't quite mastered that one yet, and to be frank, it's not high up
on my hit list of languages to learn next ;-)
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Dne Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Simon Brouwer napsal:
I have some thoughts on the technology preview. First, I'm not sure if
anonymous contributions should be allowed. Without a real name and
contact information it may be too difficult to establish if the
information is properly
Dne Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:07:13AM +0100, Alex Thurgood napsal:
Robert Ludvik a écrit :
Hi Robert,
From my point of view it is terrific idea. I know doctors and lawyers
who are creating their own small dictionaries and would really like to
contribute words into the official spellcheck
As a member of the Dutch Open Language Initiative 'OpenTaal'
(www.opentaal.org), linked to the dutch ooo localisation group, I was
directed to this new initiative.
And a nice one it is. It would contribute a lot in harvesting words.
Which is my contribution to the Dutch Open language
