Re: [l10n-dev] Entire Vietnamese translation cross review

2009-02-13 Thread Rafaella Braconi
Hi Nguyen Vu Hung, On 02/12/09 06:23, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: Hello all, 12 of our Vietnamese team members will do a cross review against the entire Vietnamese translation which is available on pootle. The target is 3.1 so we have one month until the deadline. Not really. The last date for

Re: [l10n-dev] Suggestion for Sardinian Localization Project

2009-02-13 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Valter, On Thursday, 2009-02-12 19:07:29 +0100, Valter Mura wrote: - I submit an Enhancement issue in l10n subcomponent i18npool, stating _sc-IT_ as [xxx-YY] (ISO 639-1 exists for Sardinian It ('sc') is a Macrolanguage code though, which means it encompasses several specific Sardinian

Re: [l10n-dev] Entire Vietnamese translation cross review

2009-02-13 Thread F Wolff
Op Vr, 2009-02-13 om 02:16 +0900 skryf Nguyen Vu Hung: Vietnamese, and probably Japanese, Korean and Chinese as well have a big problem in word segmentation that prevents pootle from making a good terminology. At least in Vietnamese, the feature suggested terminology in pootle is quite

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

2009-02-13 Thread André Schnabel
Hi, sophie schrieb: Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Sorry, but I cannot see any point to put a smiley here. Indeed thanks to Ain as he is only

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

2009-02-13 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
Hi André, In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. ... In fact there have been (once again) string changes after UI freeze, after Code Freze, after branching the release codeline and after starting the stopper suggestions. dbaccess

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

2009-02-13 Thread sophie
Hi André, Sorry, my first was sent with a wrong adress André Schnabel wrote: Hi, sophie schrieb: Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Sorry,

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

2009-02-13 Thread Pavel Janík
Hi, On 13.2.2009, at 22:15, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: We might have a communication problem. In my understanding, changing resources so that the effective strings stay the same, but maybe identifiers change, or strings are moved within files, or such, is an alloed

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

2009-02-13 Thread Ain Vagula
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 22:41, André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, sophie schrieb: Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Sorry, but I cannot