Hi,
the new builds are comming soon!
Cheers,
Ivo
Serg Bormant wrote:
Hi,
yes, m16 contains 1st l10n round fixes and doesn't contain 2nd.
So, this is by design. Thanks for explanation.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Hi,
yes, m16 contains 1st l10n round fixes and doesn't contain 2nd.
So, this is by design. Thanks for explanation.
--
wbr, sb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h.
Hi,
this build should contain all fixes from the first round but not the
fixes from the current one I do.
Can you give some examples what you fix what time ?
Cheers,
Ivo
On 27.04.2010 08:18, Serg Bormant wrote:
Hello.
OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes.
Hi Serg,
no, m16 doesn't contain the fixes from the 2nd L10N round. IMHO they
will be in CWS "ooo321l10n4" and it's planned to integrate them into the
next milestone.
Best regards
Marcus
Serg Bormant wrote:
OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes.
Is this b
Hi Serg,
Serg Bormant ha scritto:
Hello.
OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes.
Is this by design and we need to wait special l10n build or something
goes wrong?
we are targeting the m17 to integrate the translations.So ye, in the m16
you won't find the late
Hello.
OOo-Dev_OOO320m16_Win_x86_langpack_ru.exe doesn't contain pootle fixes.
Is this by design and we need to wait special l10n build or something
goes wrong?
--
wbr, sb
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffi