Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi André, On 16/02/09 21:31, André Schnabel wrote: Hi, Rafaella Braconi schrieb: L10n builds should be available any moment. Found it on the servers (and could not help downloading it). I did just a few very quick tests and already found an error. In Tools - Extras, OOo - Fonts the

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi Andras, On 17/02/09 09:14, Andras Timar wrote: 2009.02.16. 21:31 keltezéssel, André Schnabel írta: The new string is in pootle and also in the sdf file that has been delivered. So - seems like an error during integration. How should we exactly report this? And more important to me - do we

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi Rafaella, raising my hand for a pt-BR build. Thank you olivier Rafaella Braconi escreveu: Hi Sophie, Yes, it seems that we are still waiting for Arabic localization. Actually, there will be a new CWS to integrate the remaining Arabic localization to minimize the impact on the l0n build

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi Pavel, We might have a communication problem. In my understanding, changing resources so that the effective strings stay the same, but maybe identifiers change, or strings are moved within files, or such, is an alloed change. string is and ordered set of: { actual string, identifier }.

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi, sophie schrieb: Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Sorry, but I cannot see any point to put a smiley here. Indeed thanks to Ain as he is only

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi André, In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. ... In fact there have been (once again) string changes after UI freeze, after Code Freze, after branching the release codeline and after starting the stopper suggestions. dbaccess

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi André, Sorry, my first was sent with a wrong adress André Schnabel wrote: Hi, sophie schrieb: Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Sorry,

Re: [l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi, On 13.2.2009, at 22:15, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: We might have a communication problem. In my understanding, changing resources so that the effective strings stay the same, but maybe identifiers change, or strings are moved within files, or such, is an alloed

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 22:41, André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net wrote: Hi, sophie schrieb: Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Sorry, but I cannot

Re: [l10n-dev] changed strings in 310_m1

Hi Ain, Ain Vagula wrote: In dbaccess/ui/dlg.po 8 strings changed since m40. Only removal of fuzzy-tags was necessary. Thank you for following this and inform us :) Kind regards Sophie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: