[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1441) CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16052065#comment-16052065 ] Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1441: - Applied patch:

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1441) CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16052049#comment-16052049 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1441: Taking patch from reviewboard and attaching >

[jira] [Work started] (LENS-1441) CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on LENS-1441 started by Rajat Khandelwal. -- > CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not >

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1441) CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1441: --- Attachment: LENS-1441.01.patch > CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1441) CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16052048#comment-16052048 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1441: Created https://reviews.apache.org/r/60155/ >

Review Request 60155: LENS-1441: CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60155/ --- Review request for lens. Bugs: LENS-1441

[jira] [Created] (LENS-1441) CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
Rajat Khandelwal created LENS-1441: -- Summary: CandidateTableResolver should not add StorageCandidate if storage is not supported Key: LENS-1441 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1441

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1432) Map Join tuning broken for this query leading to Map timeouts

2017-06-16 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051724#comment-16051724 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1432: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1415 (See

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-06-16 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051725#comment-16051725 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1439: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1415 (See

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1438) Testcase failure after LENS-1432

2017-06-16 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051723#comment-16051723 ] Hudson commented on LENS-1438: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1415 (See

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1438) Testcase failure after LENS-1432

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1438: --- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Testcase failure after

[jira] [Updated] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajat Khandelwal updated LENS-1439: --- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Having clause getting

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1439) Having clause getting skipped if query goes to a segmentation containing single segment

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051653#comment-16051653 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1439: Committed myself. > Having clause getting skipped if

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1438) Testcase failure after LENS-1432

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16051652#comment-16051652 ] Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1438: Committed myself. > Testcase failure after LENS-1432 >

Re: Review Request 60115: Unit test cases for Virtual fact [LENS-1437] and fix in virtual fact update command [LENS-1440]

2017-06-16 Thread Rajat Khandelwal
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60115/#review178091 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajat Khandelwal On June 15, 2017, 9:16

Re: Review Request 60115: Unit test cases for Virtual fact [LENS-1437] and fix in virtual fact update command [LENS-1440]

2017-06-16 Thread Rajitha R
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60115/ --- (Updated June 16, 2017, 2:32 p.m.) Review request for lens and Amareshwari