[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16353408#comment-16353408
]
Hudson commented on LENS-1459:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1458 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Lens-Commit/1458/])
LENS-1459: Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination
(rajatgupta59: rev 10eef27a0dcbb1a3b918ec0ceeabefd206e13045)
* (edit)
lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateCoveringSetsResolver.java
> Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant
> candidates
> ---
>
> Key: LENS-1459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch
>
>
> After the optimization in LENS-1452, Combinations as mentioned in the jira
> summary can get created. Say the time range queried is {{\[f, t)}}, Candidate
> {{a}} and {{b}} can cover {{\[f, m)}} and candidate {{c}} can cover {{\[m,
> t)}}. Say a Union candidate is represented as {{U(cand1, cand2,...)}}. Then
> the code creates {{U(a,b,c), U(a,c) and U(b,c)}}. If {{U(a,b,c)}} is picked
> as final candidate, then one of {{a}} or {{b}} doesn't resolve partitions and
> {{time_range_in}} clause is left as it is for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128709#comment-16128709
]
Hudson commented on LENS-1459:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1433 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Lens-Commit/1433/])
LENS-1459: Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination
(rajatgupta59: rev e6f1ce0e2927d84a9cd2800f7630305114af1bb4)
* (edit)
lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateCoveringSetsResolver.java
> Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant
> candidates
> ---
>
> Key: LENS-1459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch
>
>
> After the optimization in LENS-1452, Combinations as mentioned in the jira
> summary can get created. Say the time range queried is {{\[f, t)}}, Candidate
> {{a}} and {{b}} can cover {{\[f, m)}} and candidate {{c}} can cover {{\[m,
> t)}}. Say a Union candidate is represented as {{U(cand1, cand2,...)}}. Then
> the code creates {{U(a,b,c), U(a,c) and U(b,c)}}. If {{U(a,b,c)}} is picked
> as final candidate, then one of {{a}} or {{b}} doesn't resolve partitions and
> {{time_range_in}} clause is left as it is for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128696#comment-16128696
]
Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1459:
Committed myself.
> Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant
> candidates
> ---
>
> Key: LENS-1459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch
>
>
> After the optimization in LENS-1452, Combinations as mentioned in the jira
> summary can get created. Say the time range queried is {{\[f, t)}}, Candidate
> {{a}} and {{b}} can cover {{\[f, m)}} and candidate {{c}} can cover {{\[m,
> t)}}. Say a Union candidate is represented as {{U(cand1, cand2,...)}}. Then
> the code creates {{U(a,b,c), U(a,c) and U(b,c)}}. If {{U(a,b,c)}} is picked
> as final candidate, then one of {{a}} or {{b}} doesn't resolve partitions and
> {{time_range_in}} clause is left as it is for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128654#comment-16128654
]
Hadoop QA commented on LENS-1459:
-
Applied patch:
[LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12882117/LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16%3A28%3A29.patch]
and ran command: mvn clean install -fae. Result: Success. Build Job:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-Lens-Build/1382/
> Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant
> candidates
> ---
>
> Key: LENS-1459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch
>
>
> After the optimization in LENS-1452, Combinations as mentioned in the jira
> summary can get created. Say the time range queried is {{\[f, t)}}, Candidate
> {{a}} and {{b}} can cover {{\[f, m)}} and candidate {{c}} can cover {{\[m,
> t)}}. Say a Union candidate is represented as {{U(cand1, cand2,...)}}. Then
> the code creates {{U(a,b,c), U(a,c) and U(b,c)}}. If {{U(a,b,c)}} is picked
> as final candidate, then one of {{a}} or {{b}} doesn't resolve partitions and
> {{time_range_in}} clause is left as it is for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128641#comment-16128641
]
Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on LENS-1459:
---
+1
> Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant
> candidates
> ---
>
> Key: LENS-1459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch
>
>
> After the optimization in LENS-1452, Combinations as mentioned in the jira
> summary can get created. Say the time range queried is {{\[f, t)}}, Candidate
> {{a}} and {{b}} can cover {{\[f, m)}} and candidate {{c}} can cover {{\[m,
> t)}}. Say a Union candidate is represented as {{U(cand1, cand2,...)}}. Then
> the code creates {{U(a,b,c), U(a,c) and U(b,c)}}. If {{U(a,b,c)}} is picked
> as final candidate, then one of {{a}} or {{b}} doesn't resolve partitions and
> {{time_range_in}} clause is left as it is for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1459) Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant candidates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16128628#comment-16128628
]
Rajat Khandelwal commented on LENS-1459:
Small enough diff. Attaching directly
> Time union candidate creation phase is creating a combination with redundant
> candidates
> ---
>
> Key: LENS-1459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1459
> Project: Apache Lens
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cube
>Reporter: Rajat Khandelwal
>Assignee: Rajat Khandelwal
> Attachments: LENS-1459.2017-08-16_16:28:29.patch
>
>
> After the optimization in LENS-1452, Combinations as mentioned in the jira
> summary can get created. Say the time range queried is {{\[f, t)}}, Candidate
> {{a}} and {{b}} can cover {{\[f, m)}} and candidate {{c}} can cover {{\[m,
> t)}}. Say a Union candidate is represented as {{U(cand1, cand2,...)}}. Then
> the code creates {{U(a,b,c), U(a,c) and U(b,c)}}. If {{U(a,b,c)}} is picked
> as final candidate, then one of {{a}} or {{b}} doesn't resolve partitions and
> {{time_range_in}} clause is left as it is for that.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
