Hi Simon,
On 2006-07-03 at 20:01 +0200 Simon Brouwer sent off:
Thanks for this useful explanation! I will take your recommendations to
heart when implementing compounding in the Dutch spell checker files.
Did you do the checking manually, or did you use some software for this?
I did the checki
BJ wrote:
>Ispell and aspell both don't have sufficient support for
>agglutinative languages with complex compound word rules,
>unfortunately.
Just for the sake of fairness and to be precise:
Ispell is the first spell checker, that introduced the powerful affix concept
especially for a
Hi Bjoern,
Bjoern JACKE schreef:
On 2006-06-30 at 21:17 +0200 Daniel Naber sent off:
On Freitag 30 Juni 2006 11:42, Simon Brouwer wrote:
It might an idea to identify problem cases by running the list of
known-good words through the suggestion mechanism, and making a list of
all the variations
On 2006-07-03 at 15:16 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
BJ wrote:
Cases like this
and cases like Daniel mentions have to be put into a blacklist which
has to be flagged with hunspell's FORBIDDENWORD flag.
I found recently, that aspell can not (yet) handle "FORBIDDENWORD" flag or
analogous
BJ wrote:
> Cases like this
> and cases like Daniel mentions have to be put into a blacklist which
> has to be flagged with hunspell's FORBIDDENWORD flag.
I found recently, that aspell can not (yet) handle "FORBIDDENWORD" flag or
analogous mechanizm. Of course, ispell cannot either. This also
On 2006-06-30 at 21:17 +0200 Daniel Naber sent off:
On Freitag 30 Juni 2006 11:42, Simon Brouwer wrote:
It might an idea to identify problem cases by running the list of
known-good words through the suggestion mechanism, and making a list of
all the variations that are accepted (only) using the
Citēju ge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (Probably if I were them, I would do the same). Therefore their spell checker
> remains rather static and contains generally much less real (not generated)
> words, than the language, it checks..
yes, that's true. Additionally, it seems they are going the way of g
Hello, Simon,
> Also, Dutch spell checking in MS Word, which is generally considered
> quite good, appears to use mechanical compounding as it accepts certain
> contrived, nonsensical compounds. This at least suggests that it is not
> an *obviously* bad idea, for Dutch at least.
Yes, this is also
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Naber schreef:
On Freitag 30 Juni 2006 11:42, Simon Brouwer wrote:
It might an idea to identify problem cases by running the list of
known-good words through the suggestion mechanism, and making a list of
all the variations that are accepted (only) using the mechanical
com
Hi Eleonora,
ge schreef:
Dear Simon,
I think *that* would be throwing away the child. In languages like Dutch
it is so easy to form a new but perfectly valid word by compounding, it
is impossible to include all the possible combinations in a word list.
<<
All is impossible, I agree. But
On Freitag 30 Juni 2006 11:42, Simon Brouwer wrote:
> It might an idea to identify problem cases by running the list of
> known-good words through the suggestion mechanism, and making a list of
> all the variations that are accepted (only) using the mechanical
> compound mechanism. This list could
Dear Simon,
>>
I think *that* would be throwing away the child. In languages like Dutch
it is so easy to form a new but perfectly valid word by compounding, it
is impossible to include all the possible combinations in a word list.
<<
All is impossible, I agree. But it is not impossible to find
Hi Eleonora
ge wrote:
You are right, I found that there is very often just one more or less character, that makes the mechanically compounded word senseless and erroneous. However, this would cause the elimination of a lot of potentially good words, therefore this needs to be verified. Maybe th
On Friday 30 June 2006 09:52 am, Simon Brouwer wrote:
> > The shorter the words, the more catastrophic the error rate.
>
> It might then be a good idea if the spell checker would reject guessed
> compounds below a certain minimum length (configurable in the affix file).
Yes, I know, that aspell al
Hi Eleonora,
ge wrote:
Dear All,
The investigation below will be interesting for those, whose language
actively uses compound words (Hungarian, German, Dutch, Swedish, ...)
I now closed the investigation of Hungarian compound words creation.
The results are in
http://tkltrans.sourceforge.
Dear All,
The investigation below will be interesting for those, whose language
actively uses compound words (Hungarian, German, Dutch, Swedish, ...)
I now closed the investigation of Hungarian compound words creation.
The results are in
http://tkltrans.sourceforge.net/tklspell/compound.htm#c
Dear Bram,
My study about compound words might be interesting for you:
http://tkltrans.sourceforge.net/tklspell/compound.htm
Regards, Eleonora
Hello spell checking colleagues,
As you probably know I have added spell checking facilities to Vim. I'm
using the word lists in Myspell compatible for
Ar Luan 15 Lúnasa 2005 03:03 pm, scríobh Bram Moolenaar:
> I'm hoping that we can agree on a way to define compound words better.
>...
> I found an outline of a format in the online Aspell documentation. But
> it's not finished. Let me propose something, then we can discuss it,
> try it out and
Hello spell checking colleagues,
As you probably know I have added spell checking facilities to Vim. I'm
using the word lists in Myspell compatible format as input. I hope we
can continue sharing the word lists, since that is were most effort is
spent.
Spell checking in Vim works very well now
19 matches
Mail list logo
