Sounds good, thank you for feedback.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Clayton Coleman
wrote:
> That’s the long term direction, now that many extension points are
> maturing enough to be useful. But I’ll caution and say the primary goal is
> to reduce maintenance costs, improve upgrade
That’s the long term direction, now that many extension points are maturing
enough to be useful. But I’ll caution and say the primary goal is to
reduce maintenance costs, improve upgrade isolation, and maintain the
appropriate level of security, so some of the more nuanced splits might
take much
As part of the continuation of splitting OpenShift up to make it be able to
run on top of kubernetes, we just merged
https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/20344 which removes "openshift
start node" and the "openshift start" commands. This means that the
openshift binary will no longer include
