é :* mercredi 4 mai 2016 17:32
> *À :* ABDALA Olga
> *Cc :* dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> *Objet :* Re: Three-tier application deployment on OpenShift origin
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:30 AM, ABDALA Olga <olga.abd...@solucom.fr>
> wrote:
>
De : Erik Jacobs [mailto:ejac...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : lundi 9 mai 2016 14:31
À : ABDALA Olga
Cc : dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
Objet : Re: Three-tier application deployment on OpenShift origin
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:56 AM, ABDALA Olga
<olga.abd...@solucom.fr<mailto:olga.abd...@solu
Hello Luke and Erik,
Please find my reaction inline
De : Erik Jacobs [mailto:ejac...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2016 17:41
À : Luke Meyer
Cc : ABDALA Olga; dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
Objet : Re: Three-tier application deployment on OpenShift origin
Hi Luke,
I'll have
Hi Luke,
I'll have to disagree but only semantically.
For a small environment and without changing the scheduler config, the
concept of "zone" can be used. Yes, I would agree with you that in a real
production environment the Red Hat concept of a "zone" is as you described.
You could
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Erik Jacobs wrote:
> Hi Olga,
>
> Some responses inline/
>
>
> Erik M Jacobs, RHCA
> Principal Technical Marketing Manager, OpenShift Enterprise
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Phone: 646.462.3745
> Email: ejac...@redhat.com
> AOL Instant Messenger: