Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-24 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:18:49AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Fedora didn't shut down its users@ list when it deployed > discussions.fp.o. And adoption of Discourse in Fedora hasn't been very > high outside of the Silverblue/CoreOS bubble. For what it's worth, the Fedora instance is hosted (by

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-17 Thread Vadim Rutkovsky
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:28 PM Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Users: > * us...@lists.openshift.redhat.com > * Slack OpenshiftCommons div. channels > * Slack Kubernetes div. channels > * Stackoverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/openshift > > Proposals: > * Discourse > * IRC I don't

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-17 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Am 16.07.2019 um 19:11 schrieb Clayton Coleman: > :It would probably be good to solicit feedback via a survey - gather > suggestions, assess how many people prefer the existing communication > mechanisms > we have, etc. Full Ack. As far as I know there are this channels Dev: *

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-16 Thread Clayton Coleman
:It would probably be good to solicit feedback via a survey - gather suggestions, assess how many people prefer the existing communication mechanisms we have, etc. On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 12:31 PM Jason Brooks wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:20 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 12,

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Clayton Coleman
Another note - we reuse the Kubernetes slack channel, and we would have no plans to remove that channel because we get a lot of joint overlap with kube development. Adding more channels to discuss means people just have to log into more places. > On Jul 12, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, at 10:19 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > Fedora didn't shut down its users@ list when it deployed > discussions.fp.o. And adoption of Discourse in Fedora hasn't been very > high outside of the Silverblue/CoreOS bubble. Eh, but the traditional Fedora community has a pretty high

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Justin Cook
On 12 Jul 2019, 15:52 +0100, Neal Gompa , wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Michael Gugino wrote: > > > > I propose we keep the mailing list, and get back on Freenode for > > support instead of slack. In fact, I think we should move all > > openshift discussions that are not confidential

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Justin Cook
Freenode+++ On 12 Jul 2019, 15:48 +0100, Michael Gugino , wrote: > I propose we keep the mailing list, and get back on Freenode for > support instead of slack. In fact, I think we should move all > openshift discussions that are not confidential to freenode. > > On

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Michael Gugino wrote: > > I propose we keep the mailing list, and get back on Freenode for > support instead of slack. In fact, I think we should move all > openshift discussions that are not confidential to freenode. > +1. It'd be nice if the IRC channel wasn't

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Michael Gugino
I propose we keep the mailing list, and get back on Freenode for support instead of slack. In fact, I think we should move all openshift discussions that are not confidential to freenode. On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:12 AM Colin Walters wrote: > > Hi, > > I think the Common's use of Slack is not

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Clayton Coleman
We’ve historically used StackOverflow for threaded human questions / response problems. Discourse feels like it would overlap a lot with that, especially since SO is still usually better for search engines > On Jul 12, 2019, at 10:18 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:11 AM

Re: Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:11 AM Colin Walters wrote: > > Hi, > > I think the Common's use of Slack is not a good match for "support". > Requiring an invitation is also an impediment to quickly asking questions. > Further Slack is proprietary, and also any discussion there won't be easily >

Proposal: Deploy and switch to Discourse

2019-07-12 Thread Colin Walters
Hi, I think the Common's use of Slack is not a good match for "support". Requiring an invitation is also an impediment to quickly asking questions. Further Slack is proprietary, and also any discussion there won't be easily found by Google. On the other hand we have these mailing lists,