: *Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 3:55 PM
*To: *Srinivas Naga Kotaru <skot...@cisco.com>
*Cc: *dev <dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com>
*Subject: *Re: web socket support
You would just listen on whatever port is exposed by the route (the target
port). You can create multiple routes if ne
sday, December 6, 2016 at 3:55 PM
To: Srinivas Naga Kotaru <skot...@cisco.com>
Cc: dev <dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: web socket support
You would just listen on whatever port is exposed by the route (the target
port). You can create multiple routes if necessary. Router
: *Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 2:58 PM
*To: *Srinivas Naga Kotaru <skot...@cisco.com>
*Cc: *dev <dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com>
*Subject: *Re: web socket support
It's fully supported and has been since 3.0
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) <
skot...
It's fully supported and has been since 3.0
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) <
skot...@cisco.com> wrote:
> What is OpenShift strategy or plans to support web socket support at
> router layer? Our clients asking web socket support since Openshift 2 days
What is OpenShift strategy or plans to support web socket support at router
layer? Our clients asking web socket support since Openshift 2 days onwards. I
knew Openshift 2 has limited apache based node proxy but that is not a full web
socket support.
Would like to hear from your for OpenShift
