Re: [Dev] Reproducible Builds

On Sat, 08 Apr 2017 06:52:58 -0400, Bill Auger wrote: > id like to clarify a bit what i think are some mis-conceptions > expressed yesterday in the IRC channel regarding reproducible builds Hi Bill, The first step is that we simply need better tracking of exactly what source is being used to

[Dev] Orphan Pcr package [yacy] marked out-of-date

mittens2...@opmbx.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * yacy 1.90-1 [pcr] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/any/yacy/ The user provided the following additional text: 1.92 ___ Dev mailing list

Re: [Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [icedove] marked out-of-date

upstream version depends on Debian's Icedove, not Mozilla Thunderbird El 08/04/17 a las 14:40, Parabola Website Notification escribió: > kont...@ghaglund.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be > out-of-date: > > > > > The user provided the following additional text: > >

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

> I just wanted to take a moment to say that while questions were being > asked by members of our community, no one has made the public the > decision to "terminate". > However, as Ceata has already made this decision for us (which is > allowed per §7), it will be unlikely to find a replacement

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

On 08.04.2017 16:16, Luke wrote: > Multiple developers, and users, agreed on this as being a serious issue > as the funds continued growing over time. You have drawn this conclusion for them and they've naively believed you. No matter, I'm looking forward to receive the written notice from the

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

Le sam. 8 avril 2017 à 5:26, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic a écrit : On 08.04.2017 01:58, Isaac David wrote: ergo the call for considering cancelling the agreement. So you admit this is what it was all about with the original post: Showing dissatisfaction with Ceata's performance as fiscal

[Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [icedove] marked out-of-date

kont...@ghaglund.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: Thunderbird 52 is available ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu

[Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [icedove] marked out-of-date

kont...@ghaglund.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: The user provided the following additional text: Thunderbird 52 is available ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu

[Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [icedove] marked out-of-date

kont...@ghaglund.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * icedove 1:45.8.0.deb3-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/icedove/ * icedove 1:45.8.0.deb3-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/icedove/

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

On 04/08/2017 04:20 AM, fauno wrote: > Luke writes: >> I am unsure who exactly you are referring to as having "selfish brat >> behaviour", but as someone who just happened to stumble upon this mess >> when requesting help with postage and hardware for things I already >>

[Dev] Reproducible Builds

id like to clarify a bit what i think are some mis-conceptions expressed yesterday in the IRC channel regarding reproducible builds a jenkins server is not a requirement for this task - there is no standard procedure or tooling to achieve reproducibility - the jenkins integration is for the

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

On 08.04.2017 01:58, Isaac David wrote: > ergo the call for considering cancelling the agreement. So you admit this is what it was all about with the original post: Showing dissatisfaction with Ceata's performance as fiscal sponsor, for Parabola hackers to decide "canceling the agreement" since

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

On 08.04.2017 01:32, Luke wrote: > No one bothered to respond to my e-mail which pointed out quite > explicitly the problem I see with Ceata and accepting donations.[1] > 1. https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-April/004894.html Don't worry, you will. A little over 24 hours have passed

Re: [Dev] Some doubts about Parabola's donations

On 04/08/2017 12:58 AM, Isaac David wrote: > > Le ven. 7 avril 2017 à 16:37, hellekin a écrit : >> How comes adhocracy and >> consensus went to shit when it came to handling money? > > well, no consensus was required to cancel the agreement, > No consensus was required to