Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

2017-04-22 Thread Andreas Grapentin
I found at least one significant difference between abrowser and iceweasel: > [abrowser] is also modified so that if you install add-ons they use > the ones on the Trisquel add-on site because the mozilla site > encourages users to install non-free add-ons source:

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

2017-04-22 Thread Megver83
I'm not sure about this migration. I remember that when I used Trisquel's abrowser, it was very buggy and many users complained (up to now). I do not know if Trisquel's version is the latest, if that is the case, I oppose to this migration. However, it could be added to [libre-testing] to

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

2017-04-22 Thread Nicolás A . Ortega
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 08:33:27PM +0200, Andreas Grapentin wrote: > > How different are iceweasel and icecat? could we maybe drop the former > and only maintain the latter? > Main difference, afaik, is that IceCat follows ESR while IceWeasel stays up-to-date (although this doesn't seem to be

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

2017-04-22 Thread Andreas Grapentin
How different are iceweasel and icecat? could we maybe drop the former and only maintain the latter? -A On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 05:41:48PM +0200, Nicolás A. Ortega wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:20:43AM -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Someone reported via parabolaweb that

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

2017-04-22 Thread Nicolás A . Ortega
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:20:43AM -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: > Hi all, > > Someone reported via parabolaweb that Iceweasel is out of date, so I > began to look in to how to update it (having been the original > packager of Iceweasel when it first came to Parabola; before handing > it off to

Re: [Dev] Deletions reverted

2017-04-22 Thread Luke Shumaker
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 17:48:27 -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: > Hi all, > > - repo > > - wiki And I forgot - git I'll restore from the gitlab backup later today. It synced every 3 hours, IIRC. The git-meta tracker ran every hour and logged the HEAD ref, so that will help with knowing if we lost

[Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

2017-04-22 Thread Luke Shumaker
Hi all, Someone reported via parabolaweb that Iceweasel is out of date, so I began to look in to how to update it (having been the original packager of Iceweasel when it first came to Parabola; before handing it off to Emulatorman). When I first added Iceweasel, it was by mimicking ConnOS (our

[Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel] marked out-of-date

2017-04-22 Thread Parabola Website Notification
kont...@ghaglund.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * iceweasel 1:52.0.2.deb1-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/iceweasel/ * iceweasel 1:52.0.2.deb1-1 [libre] (x86_64):

Re: [Dev] I want to become a parabola hacker!

2017-04-22 Thread Andreas Grapentin
weird, I thought I sent profile and picture already - maybe the mailing list swallowed them... here's the profile again, for completeness. -A On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:37:09PM -0300, Megver83 wrote: > well, recently 2 packagers left the project, so maybe you could become > a packager since it