Re: [Dev] the future of arm support

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:26:32 -0400, fauno wrote: > it would be awesome if libretools could cross-build packages without the > need of a native board, like openwrt does. It can. Install 'binfmt-qemu-static' and specify '-A armv7h' when creating the chroot. (ok, this uses qemu to run ARM binaries

Re: [Dev] Goodbye Parabola

Rabu, 19 April 2017, André Silva menulis: > Hi guys, after a few days thinking about it and for personal reasons, > i've decided to say Goodbye. > > It's a very hard decision for me, but i'm feeling that my cicle ended > here to begin a new one. > > Around 2010/2011, i've

[Dev] Orphan Libre package [kdepim-runtime] marked out-of-date

pej...@autistici.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kdepim-runtime 16.12.3-1.parabola2 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kdepim-runtime/ * kdepim-runtime 16.12.3-1.parabola2 [libre] (x86_64):

Re: [Dev] Forward: Re: [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 thanks, also upgrade it for ARM and the iceweasel-l10n pkgbase please. El 25/04/17 a las 14:11, Andreas Grapentin escribió: > > I started working about that - I'm not a fan of just copying the > pkgbuild, but it looks (almost) straightforwand to

Re: [Dev] the future of arm support

Andreas Grapentin writes: > If getting EOMA cards ahead of time is an option, I would approve of > that. It would give us some headway in getting the port in shape. > Alternatively, I have a handful of raspberrypi SoCs idle around here, > which we could use as build slaves

Re: [Dev] Forward: Re: [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

I started working about that - I'm not a fan of just copying the pkgbuild, but it looks (almost) straightforwand to integrate the changes to the new version. I'll try and get an updated pkgbuild ready today. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:04:47AM -0300, Megver83 wrote: > I can confirm this, at

[Dev] libre/ruby

hey! i'm the new packager of ruby for parabola and i found you provided the patch to change json on ruby. the patches are for a json version that's 4 years old and you link to a repo on gitorius... have you been maintaining this? otherwise can you explain what you did? :)

Re: [Dev] the future of arm support

> also, not that you asked but, actually i sort of did ask - when i brought this up on the IRC yesterday - fauno suggested that this should be discussed on the mailing list i added myself and oaken-source to the etherpad as potential arm packagers as there is presumably much work to be done and

[Dev] handling the OpenSSL 1.0->1.1 upgrade

Hi all, Yesterday, Arch cut over from openssl 1.0 to openssl 1.1, and added the "openssl-1.0" package for packages that really do need 1.0 and can't be upgraded to 1.1. Anyway, I expect that most packages linked against openssl in [libre] and [pcr] need to be recompiled. There's a decent chance

[Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date

pej...@autistici.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kio 5.30.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (armv7h): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/kio/ * kio 5.32.0-2.parabola2 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio/ * kio

Re: [Dev] the future of arm support

Andreas Grapentin writes: > are you saying that currently the main issue is lack of compute > resources? if we were to have a clear understanding of to whom the hardware belongs and responsibilities, we could write to the libretea people and ask for a few as donations.