Re: [Dev] Librerelease doesn't work?

On Sat, 20 May 2017 09:07:29 -0400, Joseph Graham wrote: > | /etc/makepkg.conf: line 148: /etc/libretools.d/librefetch-makepkg.conf: > No such file or directory Wait, what? makepkg.conf is edited to look for that file by the libretools post-install script, and that file is part of libretools.

Re: [Dev] Mirror changes

pacman-mirrorlist 20170503-1.parabola1 is out oops! not until now do I realize I never released it from my staging dir. -- Isaac David GPG: 38D33EF29A7691134357648733466E12EC7BA943 ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Splitting abslibre.git into branches

On Tue, 23 May 2017 01:52:22 -0400, Andreas Grapentin wrote: > branches in git are meant for tracking variations of the same content, > not different content entirely. directories are the right tool for that. That's... not true. Branches are "meant" for tracking independent trees. If the branch

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Splitting abslibre.git into branches

On Tue, 23 May 2017 08:44:58 -0400, fauno wrote: > i agree, also the svn dir structure is awful, Well, it's awful in git. But it actually works really well with svn's idiosyncratic branching model. Which is why Arch devs still use svn for their actual use, and their svntogit is a "read only"

Re: [Dev] Blacklist zeitgeist in your-privacy-blacklist

Andreas Grapentin writes: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:34:59AM +0100, Josh Branning wrote: > > imo, if the data doesn't leave your system, regardless of what is being > recorded, then this is really a non-issue. And if someone forces access > to your system, enabling them

Re: [Dev] Is it possible to compile multiple packages at the same time with libremakepkg?

Megver83 wrote: Isaac David wrote: if so, I don't think you would gain much from having many packages compile at the same time, given that all of your cores are already in use for the longest time. But it is possible? I think so, and you don't need a new libretools to achieve it imo.

Re: [Dev] Is it possible to compile multiple packages at the same time with libremakepkg?

Isaac David: > yes, I can attest that compiling that many kernels every few weeks is > pure madness and bad for your electricity bills :) > > do you have the -j MAKEFLAG equal the number of cores in your > /etc/makepkg.conf? Yes, I do. $ cat /etc/makepkg.conf | grep MAKEFLAG #MAKEFLAGS="-j2"

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Splitting abslibre.git into branches

Luke Shumaker: What do you guys think about splitting abslibre.it so that each package is on its own branch, instead of having all of them side-by-side on the same branch? There would be no 'master' branch. out of curiosity, what are the perceived advantages? -- Isaac David GPG:

Re: [Dev] Is it possible to compile multiple packages at the same time with libremakepkg?

yes, I can attest that compiling that many kernels every few weeks is pure madness and bad for your electricity bills :) do you have the -j MAKEFLAG equal the number of cores in your /etc/makepkg.conf? if so, I don't think you would gain much from having many packages compile at the same time,

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Splitting abslibre.git into branches

I agree, I think that each branch should have its -testing, -multilib and -multilib-testing directories too. For example, the abslibre.git libre branch should have the libre, libre-testing, libre-multilib and libre-multilib-testing directories. I liked the idea, and we could also deprecate the

[Dev] Is it possible to compile multiple packages at the same time with libremakepkg?

Hi, as a package maintainer, I was thinking on why libremakepkg can't compile multiple packages at the same time, because for me, as a maintainer of some kernels, it would be much more efficient and fast if I could do that. What I do is to compile with 2 different machines (one is x86 and the

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Splitting abslibre.git into branches

Andreas Grapentin writes: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:19:41PM -0400, Luke Shumaker wrote: >> Without making any concrete decisions yet: What do you guys think >> about splitting abslibre.it so that each package is on its own branch, >> instead of having all of them

[Dev] Orphan Libre package [cups-filters] marked out-of-date

andr...@grapentin.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * cups-filters 1.13.5-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/cups-filters/ * cups-filters 1.13.5-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64):