Re: [Dev] feedback for Parabola beta ISOs

2017-10-16 Thread Ben Gailly
bill-auger, The proposed first version of the slideshow (or last if you really like it..) is available at https://github.com/OccultusCaudex/parabola-artwork/blob/master/calamares_installer_slides/ Two folders are.presents. One with the slides, one with the source files. I've made two versions

Re: [Dev] [RCF][Discussion] '[kernels]' repository

2017-10-16 Thread Megver83
El 16/10/17 a las 20:29, Luke Shumaker escribió: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:24:55 -0400, > Megver83 wrote: >> Hi, >> I maintain kernels in [kernels] for all its architectures, and ebrasca >> also maintains some too (for x86 and x64 only). >> >> I was wondering how much ppl uses them (can we know the

[Dev] Orphan Libre package [qutebrowser] marked out-of-date

2017-10-16 Thread Parabola Website Notification
ark...@disroot.org wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * qutebrowser 0.11.0-2.parabola1 [libre] (any): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/any/qutebrowser/ The user provided the following additional text: the last release is v1.0.1

Re: [Dev] [RCF][Discussion] '[kernels]' repository

2017-10-16 Thread Luke Shumaker
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:24:55 -0400, Megver83 wrote: > Hi, > I maintain kernels in [kernels] for all its architectures, and ebrasca > also maintains some too (for x86 and x64 only). > > I was wondering how much ppl uses them (can we know the downloads?), Not really, because of mirrors. However,

Re: [Dev] [RCF][Discussion] '[kernels]' repository

2017-10-16 Thread Megver83
El 16/10/17 a las 15:24, Megver83 escribió: > Hi, > I maintain kernels in [kernels] for all its architectures, and ebrasca > also maintains some too (for x86 and x64 only). > > I was wondering how much ppl uses them (can we know the downloads?), > because for example the Knock patches which are

[Dev] [RCF][Discussion] '[kernels]' repository

2017-10-16 Thread Megver83
Hi, I maintain kernels in [kernels] for all its architectures, and ebrasca also maintains some too (for x86 and x64 only). I was wondering how much ppl uses them (can we know the downloads?), because for example the Knock patches which are maintained by Emulatorman are giving me some issues, and

Re: [Dev] feedback for Parabola beta ISOs

2017-10-16 Thread Megver83
El 16/10/17 a las 08:01, Ben Gailly escribió: > Hi ! > > bill-auger, Megver83, > > I've add on my Github https://github.com/OccultusCaudex/parabola-artwork > several artworks: > > Two new wallpapers, which I think could be better as default. With a > Systemd and OpenRC version (under the demand

Re: [Dev] feedback for Parabola beta ISOs

2017-10-16 Thread Ben Gailly
Hi ! bill-auger, Megver83, I've add on my Github https://github.com/OccultusCaudex/parabola-artwork several artworks: Two new wallpapers, which I think could be better as default. With a Systemd and OpenRC version (under the demand of Megver83) with a better quality and more visual than the

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date

2017-10-16 Thread jc_gargma
> The user provided the following additional text: I've attached a git format-patch to update kio to 5.39.0 -jc From 141facb34cf62945bc2490c1034db8c4ede90a79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: jc_gargma Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 01:35:30 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Updated

[Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date

2017-10-16 Thread Parabola Website Notification
jc_gar...@iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * kio 5.38.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio/ * kio 5.38.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/kio/