Re: [Dev] [RCF][Discussion] '[kernels]' repository
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:43:57 -0400, Megver83 wrote: > El 16/10/17 a las 20:29, Luke Shumaker escribió: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:24:55 -0400, > > Megver83 wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I maintain kernels in [kernels] for all its architectures, and ebrasca > >> also maintains some too (for x86 and x64 only). > >> > >> I was wondering how much ppl uses them (can we know the downloads?), > > > > Not really, because of mirrors. However, assuming that most users are > > using redirector and/or repomirror, we can probably get a decent > > estimate. > > > > Here's a breakdown of GET requests for the .pkg.tar.xz files that hit > > repomirror in the last month (2017-09-17 through 2017-09-16): > > Did you mean 2017-09-17 through *2017-10-16* maybe? Oops, yes I did. > > 1 linux-libre-audit > > 1 linux-libre-knock > > 1 linux-libre-lts-apparmor > > 1 linux-libre-pck > > 1 linux-libre-xen > > 2 linux-libre-lts-knock > > 3 linux-libre-pae > > 5 linux-libre-apparmor > > 7 linux-libre-nand > > 30 linux-libre-hardened > > 253 linux-libre-lts > >1911 linux-libre > > > > These are likely slightly lower than the actual numbers. > > > This is considering all the architectures? Because if we can see the > specific requested .pkg.tar.xz files that means we can also see the arch'es. Yes, that list is for all architectures. Here's a list with architectures (2017-09-17 --- 2017-10-17): 1 linux-libre mips64el 1 linux-libre-audit x86_64 1 linux-libre-knock x86_64 1 linux-libre-lts armv7h 1 linux-libre-lts-apparmor i686 1 linux-libre-lts-knock i686 1 linux-libre-lts-knock x86_64 1 linux-libre-pck x86_64 1 linux-libre-xen i686 2 linux-libre-hardened armv7h 2 linux-libre-nand x86_64 3 linux-libre-pae i686 5 linux-libre-apparmor x86_64 5 linux-libre-nand i686 10 linux-libre armv7h 30 linux-libre-hardened x86_64 39 linux-libre-lts i686 220 linux-libre-lts x86_64 229 linux-libre i686 1728 linux-libre x86_64 -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre-hardened] marked out-of-date
El 17/10/17 a las 17:25, Parabola Website Notification escribió: > dezpo...@dezponia.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be > out-of-date: > > > * linux-libre-hardened 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-hardened/ > * linux-libre-hardened 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened/ > * linux-libre-hardened-docs 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-hardened-docs/ > * linux-libre-hardened-docs 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-docs/ > * linux-libre-hardened-headers 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-hardened-headers/ > * linux-libre-hardened-headers 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (x86_64): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-headers/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > Outdated compared to upstream Arch and also has a High severity security > vulnerability: https://security.archlinux.org/AVG-446 > > ___ > Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > I know, I was compiling it yesterday but then I had some issues and had to reboot mi PC. I'll get it ready today I hope -- ~Megver83 SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@diasp.org Tox: megve...@toxme.io GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 GNUSocial: @megve...@quitter.cl Diaspora*: David P. (same XMPP ID) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
[Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre-hardened] marked out-of-date
dezpo...@dezponia.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * linux-libre-hardened 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-hardened/ * linux-libre-hardened 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened/ * linux-libre-hardened-docs 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-hardened-docs/ * linux-libre-hardened-docs 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-docs/ * linux-libre-hardened-headers 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/linux-libre-hardened-headers/ * linux-libre-hardened-headers 4.13.5_gnu.a-1 [libre] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/x86_64/linux-libre-hardened-headers/ The user provided the following additional text: Outdated compared to upstream Arch and also has a High severity security vulnerability: https://security.archlinux.org/AVG-446 ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
[Dev] Orphan Pcr package [yoshimi] marked out-of-date
j...@posteo.net wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: * yoshimi 1.3.5-1 [pcr] (i686): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/yoshimi/ * yoshimi 1.3.5-1 [pcr] (x86_64): https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/x86_64/yoshimi/ The user provided the following additional text: I believe that 1.5.4-1 is stable. See below: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yoshimi/ ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
