this message contains not text but only an HTML part
please re-send this message as raw text-only
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
polaris@polaris.coffee wants to notify you that the following packages may be
out-of-date:
* icecat 45.7.0_gnu1-1 [libre] (armv7h):
https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/armv7h/icecat/
* icecat 52.6.0_gnu1-2 [libre] (i686):
https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/icecat/
*
parab...@concati.me wants to notify you that the following packages may be
out-of-date:
* openrc 0.35.5-1.parabola1 [pcr] (armv7h):
https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/armv7h/openrc/
* openrc 0.35.5-1.parabola1 [pcr] (i686):
https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/pcr/i686/openrc/
*
On June 13, 2018 2:09 AM, bill-auger wrote:
> if you have the link to the arch isue could you add it to the
>
> freedom issue on the parabola bug tracker
It's already there, in the comment #3. Or did you mean to add it to a
Description or some other field more suitable for that? Unfortunately,
I disagree, I don't believe the collection of workarounds in
/etc/drirc to be a freedom problem. It isn't *trying* to load them
(like Linux might with non-free blobs). The user won't be confused in
to thinking something is wrong if the non-free thing isn't installed.
My shamelessly detached
El 12/06/18 a las 15:36, Luke Shumaker escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> Because Mesa was a point of contention last year, I'm publicly
> discussing this here.
>
> I've unblacklisted extra/mesa, and am going to remove libre/mesa. The
> differences are:
>
> - libre/mesa said "free" instead of
