Hi Wes,
> Are there any public plans for building RDO packages on CentOS-Stream
> available for the community to review?
Do you mean c8-stream or c9-stream?
c9s is not there yet, so I'll assume c8s: RDO packages should work on
c8s as they are, do you have specific example where is that not the
Hi Pete,
> How is building on CentOS Stream better than building on Fedora?
centos8 stream is preview of the next minor RHEL8 release
and c9 stream will be next RHEL major preview
We had RDO Trunk on Fedora in the past and it was not sustainable to
maintain, it's basic principle to keep
How is building on CentOS Stream better than building on Fedora?
-- Pete
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:16:37 -0600
Wesley Hayutin wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Are there any public plans for building RDO packages on CentOS-Stream
> available for the community to review?
>
> Thanks 0/
Greetings,
Are there any public plans for building RDO packages on CentOS-Stream
available for the community to review?
Thanks 0/
___
dev mailing list
dev@lists.rdoproject.org
http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
To unsubscribe:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 14:48, Alan Pevec wrote:
>
> err, wrong quote! Below was reply to this part of your email:
>
> > However, did you notice that oslo.log also claims to require
> > python-dateutil>=2.7.0
>
> yes, Yatin and I had a chat the other day [1]
> conclusion was "we got lucky until
> Hi folks,
>
> Would you please tag and push a new rdopkg release?
>
> https://github.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg/issues/186
>
> It would be really nice to have
> https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/18391 in a release.
>
Hi Ken,
We have tagged a new rdopkg release (1.3.0), and built
Hi Pierre,
> > > I submitted a patch to raise the minimum requirement for dateutil in
> > > cloudkitty: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742477/
thanks for that!
> > > However, how are those requirements taken into consideration when
> > > packaging OpenStack in RDO? RDO packages for CentOS7
err, wrong quote! Below was reply to this part of your email:
> However, did you notice that oslo.log also claims to require
> python-dateutil>=2.7.0
yes, Yatin and I had a chat the other day [1]
conclusion was "we got lucky until cloudkitty" :)
[1]
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 11:46, Alan Pevec wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> > I submitted a patch to raise the minimum requirement for dateutil in
> > cloudkitty: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742477/
> > However, how are those requirements taken into consideration when
> > packaging OpenStack in RDO?
