Re: [DISCUSS] Release Cadence

2017-09-06 Thread Bikas Saha
Hi, 4 months might be too long for a relatively new project like Livy. And doing a release in December might not be easy with that being holiday season in many places. I was thinking of following Spark's history of 3 month releases initially. That provides about 2 months of feature

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Cadence

2017-09-06 Thread Alex Bozarth
I think we discussed this some in a previous chain and came to the general consensus that a time based release cadence was best but didn't settle on the cadence length. Personally I think every 4 months (thus our next release around new years) would work well and give us flexibility to release a

[DISCUSS] Release Cadence

2017-09-06 Thread Bikas Saha
Hi, We just did our first release and hopefully have ironed out the release mechanics and also provided users a transition point to move over their dependencies to ASF. I think now would be a good time to figure out our release mechanics. IMO time based release mechanics have worked out well

Re: The process of Livy 0.4.0-incubating release

2017-09-06 Thread Bikas Saha
This is great! We have a first release. I will start a thread on general release cadence. Bikas From: Alex Bozarth Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 9:43 AM To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: The process of Livy 0.4.0-incubating