Re: [log4j] providing sourcewith Message

I should add that manually testing it works. Sent from my phone > On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:45 AM, Jeffrey Shaw wrote: > > I added some tests for traced, but they don't pass. The mocks say, "Actually, > there were zero interactions with this mock." I could use some help

Re: [log4j] providing sourcewith Message

I added some tests for traced, but they don't pass. The mocks say, "Actually, there were zero interactions with this mock." I could use some help getting these two tests to work.

Re: [Log4j] Incorrect information about markers in SLF4J documentation

On Dec 19, 2017 14:15, "Ralph Goers" wrote: Yes, that is indeed incorrect and should be reported. Good catch! Yes, please do report it, providing a patch would be best. Gary Ralph > On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > I just

Re: [Log4j] Incorrect information about markers in SLF4J documentation

Yes, that is indeed incorrect and should be reported. Ralph > On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > I just realized that the documentation for SLF4J contain incorrect > information about markers: > > https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#marker_interface >

[Log4j] Incorrect information about markers in SLF4J documentation

I just realized that the documentation for SLF4J contain incorrect information about markers: https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#marker_interface https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#fatal It says that only Logback support markers, while in fact Log4j 2 also supports it. Maybe we should report a bug?