Re: [log4j] log4j-core test speed breakdown

2018-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > I the delay is there for the "testClose" test cast, but it slows down the > other test methods as well, which is unintended. > > I have fixed it now by breaking out the "testClose" test case to its own > class. Great! And thank you. Gary

Re: [log4j] log4j-core test speed breakdown

2018-01-25 Thread Mikael Ståldal
I the delay is there for the "testClose" test cast, but it slows down the other test methods as well, which is unintended. I have fixed it now by breaking out the "testClose" test case to its own class. On 2018-01-23 14:39, Gary Gregory wrote: It would be nice to heard from Mike his thought

Re: [log4j] Adding methods to org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.nosql.NoSqlObject

2018-01-25 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Is it really that useful to have "NoSQL" as an abstraction in the first place? Is there that much code to share? On 2018-01-22 21:43, Gary Gregory wrote: On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: Back when I wrote the initial CassandraAppender implementation, I found the existing

Re: [log4j][LOG4J2-2195] PatternLayout, %exception, separator, and suffix

2018-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> >> > On Jan 25, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi All: >> > >> > I am looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2195 >> > >> > Looking at our do

Re: [log4j][LOG4J2-2195] PatternLayout, %exception, separator, and suffix

2018-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > > On Jan 25, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > Hi All: > > > > I am looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2195 > > > > Looking at our documentation for PatternLayout, the way I interpret > > "suffix" is tha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc2

2018-01-25 Thread Scott Deboy
Thanks Matt! Looks good! Scott On 1/25/18, Matt Sicker wrote: > This vote passes with 3 +1 votes from Scott Deboy, Remko Popma, and myself. > I'll be following up with an announcement thread shortly. > > On 24 January 2018 at 18:50, Matt Sicker wrote: > >> So far so good with this vote. I'll f

Re: [log4j][LOG4J2-2195] PatternLayout, %exception, separator, and suffix

2018-01-25 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > I am looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2195 > > Looking at our documentation for PatternLayout, the way I interpret > "suffix" is that it is a string printed _after_ the stack trace is printed > out. Make

[ANN] Release of Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0

2018-01-25 Thread Matt Sicker
The Apache Logging Services project is pleased to announce the availability of Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0. This is a long-awaited release of the Chainsaw trunk/master code. Apache Chainsaw is a Java GUI application to search, watch, and gather log data from applications, particularly applications using

[log4j][LOG4J2-2195] PatternLayout, %exception, separator, and suffix

2018-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: I am looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2195 Looking at our documentation for PatternLayout, the way I interpret "suffix" is that it is a string printed _after_ the stack trace is printed out. Makes sense, handy. The "separator" attribute is supposed to represent the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc2

2018-01-25 Thread Matt Sicker
This vote passes with 3 +1 votes from Scott Deboy, Remko Popma, and myself. I'll be following up with an announcement thread shortly. On 24 January 2018 at 18:50, Matt Sicker wrote: > So far so good with this vote. I'll finish the release process tomorrow > morning (approximately 15 hours from t

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > Yes, but it is unfortunate that the worry about the main repo size make us > hesitate splitting out stuff from log4j-core into own modules. And, with perfect timing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1863?focusedCommentId=16339

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-25 Thread Mikael Ståldal
Yes, but it is unfortunate that the worry about the main repo size make us hesitate splitting out stuff from log4j-core into own modules. On 2018-01-24 22:37, Ralph Goers wrote: They are not really orthogonal. 1. Log4j core contains some stuff that isn’t really “core” functionality., such as

Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j

2018-01-25 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Thanks for that Remko. > > We are about due for another Log4j 2 release. I won’t be able to get a > release of log4j-server and then move the plugins to the plugins project in > a short enough time to warrant holding off a Log4j 2 release. So