Move Chainsaw to dormant: Q

2024-02-12 Thread Tim Perry
Do dormant projects clearly indicate they can be re-animated by a sufficient number of active committers? Thanks, Tim

Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant

2024-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Gary On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:32 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hello, > > This vote is to put Chainsaw to the "Dormant" components. There is much work > to be done on this component, but not enough hours can be committed to do > that work. To reflect this situation to the user, it is

Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant

2024-02-12 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
+1 Piotr On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 22:32, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hello, > > This vote is to put Chainsaw to the "Dormant" components. There is much work > to be done on this component, but not enough hours can be committed to do > that work. To reflect this situation to the user, it is

Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant

2024-02-12 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 Ralph > On Feb 12, 2024, at 2:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hello, > > This vote is to put Chainsaw to the "Dormant" components. There is much work > to be done on this component, but not enough hours can be committed to do > that work. To reflect this situation to the user, it

Re: [VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant

2024-02-12 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 Thanks Christian Scott On 2/12/24, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > This vote is to put Chainsaw to the "Dormant" components. There is much work > to be done on this component, but not enough hours can be committed to do > that work. To reflect this situation to the user, it is

[VOTE] Move Chainsaw to dormant

2024-02-12 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello, This vote is to put Chainsaw to the "Dormant" components. There is much work to be done on this component, but not enough hours can be committed to do that work. To reflect this situation to the user, it is better to move Chainsaw to the dormant section and communicate it as "no longer

Re: [log4j] Remove `` in `main`

2024-02-12 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Volkan, On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 20:30, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > `StatusLogger` can be configured in following ways: > >1. Passing system properties to the Java process (e.g., >`-Dlog4j2.StatusLogger.level=INFO`) >2. Providing properties in a `log4j2.StatusLogger.properties` file in >

[log4j] Remove `` in `main`

2024-02-12 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
*Abstract:* I want to remove from `main` the feature that a `Configuration` (e.g., `` in a `log4j2.xml`) configuring the `StatusLogger`, and instead, only allow configuration using properties. `StatusLogger` can be configured in following ways: 1. Passing system properties to the Java process

Re: Version 2.23.0 release schedule

2024-02-12 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Gary, On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 13:22, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'll continue later today to try and fix the set Level issue... Great! I have created a bug for that: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/2281 Piotr

Re: Version 2.23.0 release schedule

2024-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I'll continue later today to try and fix the set Level issue... Gary On Mon, Feb 12, 2024, 6:15 AM Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > Hi all, > > This week I was planning to perform a 2.23.0 release. According to > Github most of the issues scheduled for this milestone are resolved: > >

Re: Version 2.23.0 release schedule

2024-02-12 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
+1 Once #2280 (fixing the `2.x` build) and #2278 (Allow arbitrary position of `` element) are in, we can put a ribbon around `2.23.0`. On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:15 PM Piotr P. Karwasz

Version 2.23.0 release schedule

2024-02-12 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi all, This week I was planning to perform a 2.23.0 release. According to Github most of the issues scheduled for this milestone are resolved: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/milestone/9 Are there any other issues I should be waiting for? Piotr