Re: [Log4j] ProcessIdUtil

I suggest that next time we want to add a Java 9 version of something not actuallly used in log4j-api, we create a Java 9 version of log4j-core and put it there. On 2017-11-25 17:53, Ralph Goers wrote: It is there because there is a Java 9 version of it and I did not want to make multiple

Re: [Log4j] ProcessIdUtil

It is there because there is a Java 9 version of it and I did not want to make multiple Java 9 modules. Ralph > On Nov 25, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2126 > > Why is ProcessIdUtil in log4j-api in the

[Log4j] ProcessIdUtil

Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2126 Why is ProcessIdUtil in log4j-api in the first place? It is only used from log4j-core. Can't we move it to log4j-core? I think that in general, we have too much things in log4j-api, and that causes problems like this.