Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-21 Thread Remko Popma
Okay. I'll update the draft blog post when I see your email. By the way, would it be possible to modify the announcement text for LOG4J2-2035 to "Fix documentation to clarify disruptor-3.3.4 is now required for async loggers (previously the docs referred to disruptor-3.3.3 which was never rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
I changed it some, yes. Ralph > On Sep 21, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > > I started writing the blog post for 2.9.1. > Quick question: no changes to the announcement text this time, is that > correct? > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> My +1 >> >> Ralph

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-21 Thread Remko Popma
I started writing the blog post for 2.9.1. Quick question: no changes to the announcement text this time, is that correct? On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > My +1 > > Ralph > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 12:07 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-20 Thread Ralph Goers
My +1 Ralph > On Sep 18, 2017, at 12:07 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artifacts > [] -1, don't release because... >

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-19 Thread Matt Sicker
+1 GPG sigs are all good. Works with my tested applications. Site notes: * https://rgoers.github.io/log4j2-site/maven-artifacts.html still has the scala api artifacts, but they're the wrong versions. * RELEASE-NOTES.md still needs to be added to rat's exclusion list. * https://rgoers.github.io/l

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-19 Thread Remko Popma
+1 Builds fine, checksums good. On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artifacts > [] -1, don't rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-18 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > From src zip: ASC OK, MD5 OK, SHA1 OK. > > I have seen an Apache Commons release use SHA-512 recently, which is nice. > In the future it would be nice if we could use SHA-512 instead of MD5 and > SHA1. > > Apache RAT check OK > > Must install

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-18 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 BTW ;-) Gary On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > From src zip: ASC OK, MD5 OK, SHA1 OK. > > I have seen an Apache Commons release use SHA-512 recently, which is nice. > In the future it would be nice if we could use SHA-512 instead of MD5 and > SHA1. > > Apache RAT check O

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-18 Thread Gary Gregory
>From src zip: ASC OK, MD5 OK, SHA1 OK. I have seen an Apache Commons release use SHA-512 recently, which is nice. In the future it would be nice if we could use SHA-512 instead of MD5 and SHA1. Apache RAT check OK Must install _before_ running _all_ CLIRR checks. CLIRR checks OK on API and 1.2

[VOTE] Release Log4j 2.9.1-rc1

2017-09-18 Thread Ralph Goers
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 project. Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. [] +1, release the artifacts [] -1, don't release because... The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes are welcom