Okay. I'll update the draft blog post when I see your email.
By the way, would it be possible to modify the announcement text for
LOG4J2-2035 to "Fix documentation to clarify disruptor-3.3.4 is now required
for async loggers (previously the docs referred to disruptor-3.3.3 which was
never rele
I changed it some, yes.
Ralph
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
> I started writing the blog post for 2.9.1.
> Quick question: no changes to the announcement text this time, is that
> correct?
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> My +1
>>
>> Ralph
I started writing the blog post for 2.9.1.
Quick question: no changes to the announcement text this time, is that
correct?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> My +1
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Sep 18, 2017, at 12:07 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> >
> > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1
My +1
Ralph
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 12:07 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1, the next version of the Log4j 2
> project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't release because...
>
+1
GPG sigs are all good. Works with my tested applications.
Site notes:
* https://rgoers.github.io/log4j2-site/maven-artifacts.html still has the
scala api artifacts, but they're the wrong versions.
* RELEASE-NOTES.md still needs to be added to rat's exclusion list.
* https://rgoers.github.io/l
+1
Builds fine, checksums good.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1, the next version of the Log4j 2
> project.
>
> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't rele
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> From src zip: ASC OK, MD5 OK, SHA1 OK.
>
> I have seen an Apache Commons release use SHA-512 recently, which is nice.
> In the future it would be nice if we could use SHA-512 instead of MD5 and
> SHA1.
>
> Apache RAT check OK
>
> Must install
+1 BTW ;-)
Gary
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> From src zip: ASC OK, MD5 OK, SHA1 OK.
>
> I have seen an Apache Commons release use SHA-512 recently, which is nice.
> In the future it would be nice if we could use SHA-512 instead of MD5 and
> SHA1.
>
> Apache RAT check O
>From src zip: ASC OK, MD5 OK, SHA1 OK.
I have seen an Apache Commons release use SHA-512 recently, which is nice.
In the future it would be nice if we could use SHA-512 instead of MD5 and
SHA1.
Apache RAT check OK
Must install _before_ running _all_ CLIRR checks.
CLIRR checks OK on API and 1.2
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.9.1, the next version of the Log4j 2 project.
Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list.
[] +1, release the artifacts
[] -1, don't release because...
The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All votes are
welcom
10 matches
Mail list logo