> > The quirky thing about this is that because log4cxx doesn't actually
> > care about the Java class name, the following lines in the config file
> > are all equivalent:
> > > class="org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender">
> >
> >
>
> I don't get your point: The second and third line
Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
am Sonntag, 18. April 2021 um 01:08 schrieben Sie:
> This loads the obsolete rolling file appender for log4cxx, which
> doesn't seem to work properly. It certainly doesn't work correctly
> for the test that I've been trying to do.
So there is apparently a difference between having your config
appender being org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender vs.
org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender. The second one(which doesn't
have the extra 'rolling' in its namespace) will only be activated if
you have /exactly/ the following
Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
am Samstag, 17. April 2021 um 04:31 schrieben Sie:
> Does anybody happen to have a known good XML file for rollover with
> compression? I'm working on LOGCXX-523 and I'm trying to configure
> the XML file to gzip the files when rolling over, but I can't get it
> to
Does anybody happen to have a known good XML file for rollover with
compression? I'm working on LOGCXX-523 and I'm trying to configure
the XML file to gzip the files when rolling over, but I can't get it
to work. It seems that the only configuration that we have in the
tests programmatically
