Since there's no central repository of C++ libraries (or C, or several
other languages for that matter; Rust providing one is a nice change
of pace), it'll be fairly difficult to get real usage stats about what
minimum compiler versions and such are still in use out there. Now I
know it's not the
Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
am Sonntag, 23. August 2020 um 03:31 schrieben Sie:
> I'm working on changes for log4cxx at the moment that involve upgrades to
> use C++11 features; that would definitely require a major change in the
> versioning, although the API would be largely the same.
OTOH,
That is for those involved in the C++ development to decide but I would wonder
a) Besides updating the compiler are there other architectural improvements
that should be made.
b) How much will the code diverge - would it be possible to share the code that
is in common somehow or would that just
I'm working on changes for log4cxx at the moment that involve upgrades to
use C++11 features; that would definitely require a major change in the
versioning, although the API would be largely the same. Part of the
question with that as well is what platforms and compilers are supported,
as
I would completely support that change.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020, 3:14 AM Ralph Goers
wrote:
> In looking at the log4cxx changelog I can’t help notice that the first
> release was 17 years ago. After all these years one would expect that the
> version should have hit 1.0.0 at least 10-15 years ago.
In looking at the log4cxx changelog I can’t help notice that the first release
was 17 years ago. After all these years one would expect that the version
should have hit 1.0.0 at least 10-15 years ago. Isn’t it time to correct that?
Ralph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thorsten Schöning resolved LOGCXX-393.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This got fixed in LOGCXX-319.
Strange compile error w/ log4cxx
