Re: @Log annotation

An actual JSR would be great, and with the current development pace of Java, I think it could actually be accepted. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 14:35, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 19, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Ralph Goers > wrote: > > > > It has been brought up before. You can read about the JSR

Re: @Log annotation

> On Jul 19, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > It has been brought up before. You can read about the JSR process at > http://jcp.org . Seems like we’d want to make this a collaborative effort, particularly because they look for a collection of experts. I’ll see if I

Re: @Log annotation

It has been brought up before. You can read about the JSR process at http://jcp.org . Ralph > On Jul 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > That doesn’t seem like a bad idea at all. Have you done that before or are > you at least familiar with the process so that I

Re: @Log annotation

That doesn’t seem like a bad idea at all. Have you done that before or are you at least familiar with the process so that I could begin working on that? -Rob > On Jul 19, 2018, at 2:04 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > We should really propose a new Logging JSR. I would make sure it includes > the

Re: @Log annotation

We should really propose a new Logging JSR. I would make sure it includes the ability for the compiler to provide the class name, method name and line number as “special” variables. Ralph > On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Maybe the smallest feature we could/should

Re: @Log annotation

Maybe the smallest feature we could/should start with it a class-level @ClassLogger() annotation which create a static final Logger initialized with the class name. Too bad Java does not have what Smalltalk calls class instance variables. I am using "ClassLogger" like JUnit has ClassRule so it

Re: @Log annotation

> On Jul 19, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > To be clear, Log4j-core should have no required dependencies other than > Log4j-API. And we would like to keep optional dependencies to a minimum. Right that makes sense to me. Hence it being an after thought, and I like Gary’s

Re: @Log annotation

To be clear, Log4j-core should have no required dependencies other than Log4j-API. And we would like to keep optional dependencies to a minimum. Ralph > On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > eOn Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:19 AM Rob Tompkins > wrote: >

Re: @Log annotation

> On Jul 19, 2018, at 11:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > FTR: https://projectlombok.org/features/log > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:48 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:26 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Gary Gregory >>>

Re: @Log annotation

FTR: https://projectlombok.org/features/log On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:48 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:26 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> >> >> > On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:07 AM Rob Tompkins >> wrote: >> > >>

Re: @Log annotation

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:26 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:07 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Gary Gregory > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Annotation-based logging comes up

Re: @Log annotation

> On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:07 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >>> >>> Annotation-based logging comes up once in a while here but we have not >>> implemented it. Project Lombok

Re: @Log annotation

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 8:07 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jul 19, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > Annotation-based logging comes up once in a while here but we have not > > implemented it. Project Lombok does that IIRC. > > Any reason for having not yet implemented it, or

Re: @Log annotation

> On Jul 19, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Annotation-based logging comes up once in a while here but we have not > implemented it. Project Lombok does that IIRC. Any reason for having not yet implemented it, or just the standard “time”? > > Gary > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018,

Re: @Log annotation

Annotation-based logging comes up once in a while here but we have not implemented it. Project Lombok does that IIRC. Gary On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 07:15 Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hey folks, > > I’m curious if anyone has thought about adding a class level @Log > annotation such that upon debug or