First, and foremost, we don’t want Log4j to have required dependencies. So
whatever the JDK supports out of the box we need to take advantage of. Whatever
it doesn’t, I agree we should delegate that to Apache Commons.
Ralph
> On Jun 18, 2023, at 12:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I agree with
I agree with Volkan, we should not accept a one-off. Instead, I would
prefer we generically support whatever Apache Commons Compress supports. I
can help beef up Compress if we need anything in there to make Log4j better.
Gary
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023, 14:52 Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Recently, somebod
