Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Davyd McColl
I would imagine that this would have to either happen on Apache infra or be a GH action administered by someone with uber rights, though, yes, this is a good option. I don't have all the working pieces in my flows, but it would be convenient for my packages to have a similar mechanism, so if

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Dominik Psenner
Is there an option to trust a ci machine and automate the publish with a push of a tag after a successful vote? With this, anyone having the possibility to push a tag can forge a release with almost no effort. -- Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find them. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Davyd McColl
Great! How do we get the nupkg to nuget.org? This is the final step that most users are going to be interested in. Having a look at what's at the url you posted, I have ideas on how to streamline future releases, so the next time I'm in that area, I'm definitely implementing those ideas. I

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-17 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ralph Goers, am Montag, 17. August 2020 um 08:08 schrieben Sie: > I noticed that the files have she and md5 files. We are not > supposed to use either of these any more and only use sha512. I can fix that. While the file extension is named ".sha", SHA-512 is calculated already: > gpg

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I noticed that the files have she and md5 files. We are not supposed to use either of these any more and only use sha512. I can fix that. I vote +1 Ralph > On Aug 9, 2020, at 10:24 AM, Robert Middleton wrote: > > I've run through the release of log4cxx 0.11.0. There's still something >

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-17 Thread Stephen Webb
I am using a recent version in production Ubuntu servers, so it is definitely release ready. +1 On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 7:27 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > I am not an expert on c++ or something, but I looked on the content, read > this thread and think it is safe to release this.

Re: [VOTE] [log4xx] Release log4cxx 0.11.0

2020-08-17 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello, I am not an expert on c++ or something, but I looked on the content, read this thread and think it is safe to release this. However, my hope is that in future more competent cxx devs than me would check it :) I vote +1 also Cheers, Christian On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, at 08:08, Ralph Goers

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Davyd McColl
The nuget.org question is probably of the highest priority - that's how most people are going to get any .net package release. If it's not on nuget.org, it might as well not be released. Any idea who would know about releasing there? Is there someone I can bother? -d On August 17, 2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Dominik Psenner
I guess that would be a nuget publish. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/nuget-org/publish-a-package The credentials to that account are stored in the private repos of logging pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients with their gpg key. -- Sent from my phone. Typos

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Davyd McColl
Correct, nuget publish. An option, once I'm trusted, is to allow me to publish. My nuget login is done via Microsoft credentials for dav...@gmail.com, and is secured by 2FA, so the only real risk is how dodgy I am (: If it's of interest to anyone, my profile is at

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-17 Thread Matt Sicker
The release notes are generated from the README.html file in the dist area. I'm not sure where they're generated from, but some sort of changelog file to go alongside the artifacts could be helpful here. Otherwise, we'd typically only worry about the download links on the logging.apache.org site.