Re: Log4j-audit release

I had time to look at this during the flight, here it is: index.html typo: Diagnostic logs are critical in aiding in maintaining the servicability -> critical in maintaining? Overall, the first three sections, "What is Audit Logging", What is the difference between audit logging and normal

Re: Async Appenders

I gotcha, if there is interest Id like to get a pr started. On Mon, May 7, 2018, 1:25 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > Log4j and Log4net don't share any code, just similar architectures. As for > why we haven't merged that into log4net, that may because it either was > never noticed or

Re: Log4j and OSGi

Nope. I have been swamped at work and there are a couple of issues I’d really like to address first. Also, I would like to get log4j-audit released. But I wouldn’t expect OSGi enhancements like this to be in 2.11.x anyway. They should be targeted at 3.0. Ralph > On May 7, 2018, at 2:02 PM,

Re: Log4j and OSGi

Even before that, or, for that, we already have a medium size change set for 2.11.1. Any thoughts on a time frame for releasing? Gary On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I just noticed https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback < >

Log4j and OSGi

I just noticed https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback . I have not looked at the OSGi R7 specification and I haven’t looked at the PR, but I’d hate to see Logback be the only thing Felix can integrate with. Ralph

Re: Async Appenders

Log4j and Log4net don't share any code, just similar architectures. As for why we haven't merged that into log4net, that may because it either was never noticed or the authors never attempted to donate it upstream in the first place. On 7 May 2018 at 12:22, William Davis

Re: Async Appenders

Ok then, so are the same Async Appenders available in Log4Net that are in Log4j ? Here are some one I'm using: https://github.com/cjbhaines/Log4Net.Async (my .net standard port: https://github.com/wjdavis5/Log4Net.Async) Also been looking into an Async Buffering Appender. Just seems we could get

Re: [VOTE] Migrate git repositories to gitbox

And here is my +1. This vote passes with 5 +1s binding and 1 +1 non-binding. I'll follow up with the migration details over the next couple days. On 30 April 2018 at 07:04, Apache wrote: > +1 > > Ralph > > > > On Apr 29, 2018, at 7:38 PM, Ílson Bolzan

Re: Async Appenders

Oh, no worries, you're on the correct list! On 7 May 2018 at 09:02, William Davis wrote: > Sorry I meant to send this to the Log4Net distro > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > Like the Kafka appender's async option? Or like

Re: Async Appenders

Sorry I meant to send this to the Log4Net distro On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Like the Kafka appender's async option? Or like the async logger and > appenders? > > On 7 May 2018 at 07:38, Remko Popma wrote: > > > Log4j core

Re: Async Appenders

Log4j core provides about 4 flavours of async logging, several of which use non-blocking data structures. Can you link to the ones you think should be included? Thanks! Remko (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info > On May 7, 2018, at 14:15, William Davis

Async Appenders

I've noticed that there are several Async implementations of standard appenders out in the wild. Is there a reason none of these have made there way into the core product? Is it just b/c no one has taken the time to do a pull request, or is there some other reason? I've had several projects where